Literature DB >> 15827257

Effect of rapid or gradual grain adaptation on subacute acidosis and feed intake by feedlot cattle.

D W Bevans1, K A Beauchemin, K S Schwartzkopf-Genswein, J J McKinnon, T A McAllister.   

Abstract

The effects of grain adaptation protocol on subacute acidosis and feed intake by cattle were studied in a completely randomized experiment using 12 crossbred heifers (384 +/- 25 kg BW). The dietary proportion of concentrate was increased from 40 to 90% (DM basis) either by rapid adaptation (65% concentrate diet fed for 3 d) or by gradual adaptation (five intermediate diets containing 48.3, 56.7, 65.0, 73.3, and 81.7% concentrate, fed for 3 d each). Feed intake and ruminal pH (by indwelling ruminal electrodes) were monitored over 20 d. Mean daily pH variables did not differ (P > or = 0.10) between treatments on any of the 3 or 4 d that 65 or 90% concentrate was fed. Variances of a number of pH variables were greater (P < 0.05) for rapidly adapted heifers than for those on the gradual adaptation protocol during adaptation to 65 and 90% concentrate. Mean hourly pH did not differ over the first 24 h of adaptation to 65% concentrate, but variance of hourly pH tended (P < 0.10) to be greater for rapidly adapted than for gradually adapted heifers for eight of the first 24 h. On the first day of feeding 90% concentrate, ruminal pH tended (P = 0.07) to be less at 11 and 12 h after feeding with rapid adaptation than with gradual adaptation. Variance of hourly pH increased steadily in rapidly adapted heifers from 6 h after feeding onward. Ruminal VFA concentration and osmolality did not differ between treatments. Ruminal lactate concentration was < 1 mM, except in two rapidly adapted heifers and one gradually adapted heifer after introduction to 90% concentrate. Adaptation method did not affect DMI or day-to-day variation in DMI. Detection of acidosis was associated with increased variance in ruminal pH variables. A range of individual responses to grain challenge was observed, but current management strategies for preventing acidosis in pens of cattle are based on responses of the most susceptible individuals. A better understanding of factors governing individual responses to acidotic challenge may allow for the development of more effective acidosis prevention practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15827257     DOI: 10.2527/2005.8351116x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  28 in total

1.  Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle.

Authors:  Emma Hernandez-Sanabria; Laksiri A Goonewardene; Zhiquan Wang; Obioha N Durunna; Stephen S Moore; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high-grain diet.

Authors:  S C Fernando; H T Purvis; F Z Najar; L O Sukharnikov; C R Krehbiel; T G Nagaraja; B A Roe; U Desilva
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Changes in the rumen epimural bacterial diversity of beef cattle as affected by diet and induced ruminal acidosis.

Authors:  R M Petri; T Schwaiger; G B Penner; K A Beauchemin; R J Forster; J J McKinnon; T A McAllister
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Performance, rumination, and rumen pH responses to different dietary energy density and feed management strategies in auction-derived feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Dexter J Tomczak; Catherine L Lockard; Jenny S Jennings; John T Richeson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Correlation of particular bacterial PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis patterns with bovine ruminal fermentation parameters and feed efficiency traits.

Authors:  Emma Hernandez-Sanabria; Le Luo Guan; Laksiri A Goonewardene; Meiju Li; Denis F Mujibi; Paul Stothard; Stephen S Moore; Monica C Leon-Quintero
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Polyclonal antibody preparations from avian origin as a feed additive to beef cattle: ruminal fermentation during the step-up transition diets.

Authors:  Gleise M Silva; Federico Podversich; Tessa M Schulmeister; Erick R S Santos; Carla Sanford; Michelle C B Siqueira; Nicolas DiLorenzo
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-20

7.  Effect of humic substances on rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility, methane emissions, and rumen microbiota in beef heifers1.

Authors:  Stephanie A Terry; Gabriel de Oliveira Ribeiro; Robert J Gruninger; Martin Hunerberg; Sheng Ping; Alex V Chaves; Jake Burlet; Karen Ann Beauchemin; Tim Angus McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effects of protein source and lipid supplementation on conservation and feed value of total mixed ration silages for finishing beef cattle.

Authors:  Gustavo Lazzari; Amanda C O Poppi; Juliana Machado; Antonio V I Bueno; Ana L M Gomes; Clóves C Jobim; João L P Daniel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Rumen bacterial communities can be acclimated faster to high concentrate diets than currently implemented feedlot programs.

Authors:  C L Anderson; C J Schneider; G E Erickson; J C MacDonald; S C Fernando
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.772

10.  Influence of sire breed on the interplay among rumen microbial populations inhabiting the rumen liquid of the progeny in beef cattle.

Authors:  Emma Hernandez-Sanabria; Laksiri A Goonewardene; Zhiquan Wang; Mi Zhou; Stephen S Moore; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.