Literature DB >> 33530108

Effects of protein source and lipid supplementation on conservation and feed value of total mixed ration silages for finishing beef cattle.

Gustavo Lazzari1, Amanda C O Poppi1, Juliana Machado1, Antonio V I Bueno1, Ana L M Gomes1, Clóves C Jobim1, João L P Daniel1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the conservation process and feed value of total mixed ration (TMR) silages. In exp. 1, we evaluated the fermentation pattern and aerobic stability of TMR silages containing different protein and lipid supplementations. In exp. 2, we compared the performance of finishing beef heifers fed those TMR silages. In both experiments, treatments were as follows: ensiled TMR with urea (U); ensiled TMR without a protein supplement at ensiling, but soybean meal supplemented at feeding to balance diet crude protein (CP) in exp. 2 (SMnf; where the acronym nf indicates nonfermented); ensiled TMR with soybean meal (SM); and ensiled TMR with rolled soybean grain (SG). Thirty-two Nellore heifers (313 ± 8.8 kg shrunk body weight [SBW]) were blocked by initial SBW, housed in individual pens, and enrolled in exp. 2 for 82 d. In exp. 1, treatment without a protein supplement (SMnf) had a lower content of CP, soluble CP, NH3-N, pH, and Clostridium count compared with U (P ≤ 0.03). Lactic acid concentrations tended to be reduced for SMnf compared with U (P = 0.09). Ethanol concentration was reduced in SG compared with SM (P < 0.01). 1,2-Propanediol concentration was increased in SMnf compared with U (P < 0.01), reduced in SM compared with SMnf (P = 0.02), and increased in SG compared with SM (P = 0.02). Dry matter (DM) loss during fermentation was low and similar among treatments (~3.7%). All silages remained stable during 10 d of aerobic exposure after feed out. Considering fermentation traits, such as pH (≤4.72), NH3-N (<10% of N, except for U treatment), butyric acid (<0.05 % DM), and DM losses (<3.70% DM), all silages can be considered well conserved. In exp. 2, diets were isonitrogenous because soybean meal was added to SMnf before feeding. Compared with SM, cattle fed SG made more meals per day (P = 0.04) and tended to have a decreased intermeal interval (P = 0.09). DM intake, average daily gain, final SBW, hot carcass weight, Biceps femoris fat thickness, and serum levels of triglycerides and cholesterol were increased for SG compared with SM (P ≤ 0.05). In brief, TMR silages exhibited an adequate fermentation pattern and high aerobic stability. The supplementation of true protein did not improve animal performance, whereas the addition of soybean grain as a lipid source improved the performance of finishing cattle fed TMR silages.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nellore; fat; heifers; protein requirement; proteolysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33530108      PMCID: PMC7887555          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  53 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal tract pH and starch in feces of ruminants.

Authors:  W E Wheeler; C H Noller
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Comparative feeding value of supplemental fat in finishing diets for feedlot steers supplemented with and without monensin.

Authors:  R A Zinn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effect of ensiling process of total mixed ration on fermentation profile, nutrient loss and in situ ruminal degradation characteristics of diet.

Authors:  Makoto Miyaji; Hiroki Matsuyama; Kazuhisa Nonaka
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 1.749

4.  Supplemental fat source affects feedlot performance and carcass traits of finishing yearling steers and estimated diet net energy value.

Authors:  R T Brandt; S J Anderson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  In vitro ruminal degradation and synthesis of protein on fractions extracted from alfalfa hay and silage.

Authors:  V D Peltekova; G A Broderick
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Adding liquid feed to a total mixed ration reduces feed sorting behavior and improves productivity of lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  T J DeVries; R M Gill
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Interaction of dietary magnesium level on the feeding value of supplemental fat in finishing diets for feedlot steers.

Authors:  J E Ramirez; R A Zinn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Dietary unsaturated fatty acids increase plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 and cholecystokinin and may decrease premeal ghrelin in lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  B J Bradford; K J Harvatine; M S Allen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Comparative feeding value of supplemental fat in steam-flaked corn- and steam-flaked wheat-based finishing diets for feedlot steers.

Authors:  R A Zinn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Effects of microbial enzymes on starch and hemicellulose degradation in total mixed ration silages.

Authors:  Tingting Ning; Huili Wang; Mingli Zheng; Dongze Niu; Sasa Zuo; Chuncheng Xu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.509

View more
  2 in total

1.  Microbial and metabolomic insights into the bovine lipometabolic responses of rumen and mammary gland to zymolytic small peptide supplementation.

Authors:  En Liu; Weiwei Xiao; Qijian Pu; Lanjiao Xu; Long Wang; Kang Mao; Wei Hong; Mingren Qu; Fuguang Xue
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-14

2.  Effects of Obligate Heterofermentative Lactic Acid Bacteria Alone or in Combination on the Conservation of Sugarcane Silage.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Mendonça Gomes; Antônio Vinicius Iank Bueno; Milene Puntel Osmari; Juliana Machado; Luiz Gustavo Nussio; Clóves Cabreira Jobim; João Luiz Pratti Daniel
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.