Literature DB >> 23584771

Changes in the rumen epimural bacterial diversity of beef cattle as affected by diet and induced ruminal acidosis.

R M Petri1, T Schwaiger, G B Penner, K A Beauchemin, R J Forster, J J McKinnon, T A McAllister.   

Abstract

Little is known about the nature of the rumen epithelial adherent (epimural) microbiome in cattle fed different diets. Using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and pyrosequencing of the V3 hypervariable coding region of 16S rRNA, epimural bacterial communities of 8 cattle were profiled during the transition from a forage to a high-concentrate diet, during acidosis, and after recovery. A total of 153,621 high-quality gene sequences were obtained, with populations exhibiting less taxonomic variability among individuals than across diets. The bacterial community composition exhibited clustering (P < 0.03) by diet, with only 14 genera, representing >1% of the rumen epimural population, differing (P ≤ 0.05) among diets. During acidosis, levels of Atopobium, Desulfocurvus, Fervidicola, Lactobacillus, and Olsenella increased, while during the recovery, Desulfocurvus, Lactobacillus, and Olsenella reverted to levels similar to those with the high-grain diet and Sharpea and Succinivibrio reverted to levels similar to those with the forage diet. The relative abundances of bacterial populations changed during diet transition for all qPCR targets except Streptococcus spp. Less than 5% of total operational taxonomic units (OTUs) identified exhibited significant variability across diets. Based on DGGE, the community structures of epithelial populations differed (P ≤ 0.10); segregation was most prominent for the mixed forage diet versus the grain, acidotic challenge, and recovery diets. Atopobium, cc142, Lactobacillus, Olsenella, RC39, Sharpea, Solobacterium, Succiniclasticum, and Syntrophococcus were particularly prevalent during acidosis. Determining the metabolic roles of these key genera in the rumens of cattle fed high-grain diets could define a clinical microbial profile associated with ruminal acidosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23584771      PMCID: PMC3675914          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03983-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  40 in total

1.  Effect of rapid or gradual grain adaptation on subacute acidosis and feed intake by feedlot cattle.

Authors:  D W Bevans; K A Beauchemin; K S Schwartzkopf-Genswein; J J McKinnon; T A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Digestion of epithelial tissue of the rumen wall by adherent bacteria in infused and conventionally fed sheep.

Authors:  D Dinsdale; K J Cheng; R J Wallace; R A Goodlad
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  An evaluation of the accuracy and precision of a stand-alone submersible continuous ruminal pH measurement system.

Authors:  G B Penner; K A Beauchemin; T Mutsvangwa
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR.

Authors:  David M Stevenson; Paul J Weimer
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Adhesion of bacteria to epithelial cell surfaces within the reticulo-rumen of cattle.

Authors:  R P McCowan; K J Cheng; C B Bailey; J W Costerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering.

Authors:  Susan M Huse; David Mark Welch; Hilary G Morrison; Mitchell L Sogin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.491

7.  Sharpea azabuensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a Gram-positive, strictly anaerobic bacterium isolated from the faeces of thoroughbred horses.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Morita; Chiharu Shiratori; Masaru Murakami; Hideto Takami; Hidehiro Toh; Yukio Kato; Fumihiko Nakajima; Misako Takagi; Hiroaki Akita; Toshio Masaoka; Masahira Hattori
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals.

Authors:  Elie Jami; Itzhak Mizrahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perturbation dynamics of the rumen microbiota in response to exogenous butyrate.

Authors:  Robert W Li; Sitao Wu; Ransom L Baldwin; Weizhong Li; Congjun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP).

Authors:  Scot E Dowd; Todd R Callaway; Randall D Wolcott; Yan Sun; Trevor McKeehan; Robert G Hagevoort; Thomas S Edrington
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  71 in total

1.  Buccal swabbing as a noninvasive method to determine bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic microbial community structures in the rumen.

Authors:  Sandra Kittelmann; Michelle R Kirk; Arjan Jonker; Alan McCulloch; Peter H Janssen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Zinc AA supplementation alters yearling ram rumen bacterial communities but zinc sulfate supplementation does not.

Authors:  Suzanne L Ishaq; Chad M Page; Carl J Yeoman; Thomas W Murphy; Megan L Van Emon; Whit C Stewart
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Changes in the Rumen Epithelial Microbiota of Cattle and Host Gene Expression in Response to Alterations in Dietary Carbohydrate Composition.

Authors:  R M Petri; M T Kleefisch; B U Metzler-Zebeli; Q Zebeli; F Klevenhusen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Prepartum and postpartum rumen fluid microbiomes: characterization and correlation with production traits in dairy cows.

Authors:  Fabio S Lima; Georgios Oikonomou; Svetlana F Lima; Marcela L S Bicalho; Erika K Ganda; Jose C de Oliveira Filho; Gustavo Lorenzo; Plamen Trojacanec; Rodrigo C Bicalhoa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  The response of ruminal fermentation, epithelium-associated microbiota, and epithelial barrier function to severe feed restriction in pregnant ewes.

Authors:  Fan Hu; Yanfeng Xue; Changzheng Guo; Junhua Liu; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 6.  Effects and immune responses of probiotic treatment in ruminants.

Authors:  Sarah Raabis; Wenli Li; Laura Cersosimo
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 2.046

7.  Response of Beef Cattle Fecal Microbiota to Grazing on Toxic Tall Fescue.

Authors:  Ryan S Mote; Nicholas S Hill; Joseph H Skarlupka; Zachary B Turner; Zachary P Sanders; Dean P Jones; Garret Suen; Nikolay M Filipov
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparisons of bacterial and archaeal communities in the rumen and a dual-flow continuous culture fermentation system using amplicon sequencing.

Authors:  I J Salfer; C Staley; H E Johnson; M J Sadowsky; M D Stern
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Solid diet manipulates rumen epithelial microbiota and its interactions with host transcriptomic in young ruminants.

Authors:  Jianmin Chai; Xiaokang Lv; Qiyu Diao; Hunter Usdrowski; Yimin Zhuang; Wenqin Huang; Kai Cui; Naifeng Zhang
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 5.476

10.  Taxonomic Identification of Ruminal Epithelial Bacterial Diversity during Rumen Development in Goats.

Authors:  Jinzhen Jiao; Jinyu Huang; Chuanshe Zhou; Zhiliang Tan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.