| Literature DB >> 15823203 |
Audrey Guérardel1, Mouna Barat-Houari, Francis Vasseur, Christian Dina, Vincent Vatin, Karine Clément, Delphine Eberlé, Valérie Vasseur-Delannoy, Christopher G Bell, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Nicole Helbecque, Natascha Potoczna, Fritz F Horber, Philippe Boutin, Philippe Froguel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cocaine and amphetamine regulated transcript (CART) is an anorectic neuropeptide located principally in hypothalamus. CART has been shown to be involved in control of feeding behavior, but a direct relationship with obesity has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of polymorphisms within the CART gene with regards to a possible association with obesity in a Caucasian population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15823203 PMCID: PMC1087839 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Figure 1SNPs map of the CART gene. SNPs are reported assigning +1 to the A of the ATG start codon. The numbering reported in the literature is given in parentheses.
Figure 2Pairwise linkage disequilibrium between the 31 SNPs of CART gene in 45 subjects. The LD was measured by delta (color scale) using the Gold software. SNPs are indicated along the horizontal and vertical axes, according to the first transcribed nucleotide position. Underlined SNPs were selected for the initial case-control study. Regions of high and low linkage disequilibrium are represented by red and blue shading, respectively.
Alleles and genotype distributions for five CART SNPs in 368 French non-obese group and in different French morbid obese groups.
| allelesa | p-valueb | OR [95%CI] | genotypesa | p-valuec | ||||
| French non-obese subjects | 311 (42.3) | 425 (57.7) | 51 (13.9) | 209 (56.8) | 108 (29.3) | |||
| 1st set of French morbid obese subjects | 299 (51.4) | 283 (48.6) | 0.001 | 1.44 [1.16–1.80] | 78 (26.8) | 143 (49.1) | 70 (24.1) | 0.0006 |
| 2nd set of French morbid obese subjects | 287 (47.5) | 317 (52.5) | 0.05 | 1.24 [1.00–1.54] | 65 (21.5) | 157 (52.0) | 80 (26.5) | 0.04 |
| Pooled set of French morbid obese subjects* | 586 (49.4) | 600 (50.6) | 0.002 | 1.33 [1.11–1.61] | 143 (24.1) | 300 (50.6) | 150 (25.3) | 0.001 |
| French non-obese subjects | 392 (53.3) | 344 (46.7) | 90 (24.5) | 212 (57.6) | 66 (17.9) | |||
| 1st set of French morbid obese subjects | 342 (58.8) | 240 (41.2) | 0.046 | 1.33 [1.11–1.61] | 102 (35.1) | 138 (47.4) | 51 (17.5) | 0.037 |
| 2nd set of French morbid obese subjects | 346 (57.1) | 260 (42.9) | 0.16 | 1.17 [0.94–1.45] | 100 (33.0) | 146 (48.2) | 57 (18.8) | 0.14 |
| Pooled set of French morbid obese subjects | 688 (57.9) | 500 (42.1) | 0.046 | 1.21 [1.004–1.45] | 202 (34.0) | 284 (47.8) | 108 (18.2) | 0.04 |
| French non-obese subjects | 438 (63.3) | 254 (36.7) | 125 (36.1) | 188 (54.3) | 33 (9.6) | |||
| 1st set of French morbid obese subjects | 306 (54.4) | 256 (45.6) | 0.0015 | 1.44 [1.15–1.81] | 82 (29.2) | 142 (50.5) | 57 (20.3) | 0.0009 |
| 2nd set of French morbid obese subjects | 345 (57.7) | 253 (42.3) | 0.04 | 1.27 [1.01–1.58] | 94 (31.4) | 157 (52.5) | 48 (16.1) | 0.028 |
| Pooled set of French morbid obese subjects | 651 (56.1) | 509 (43.9) | 0.002 | 1.35 [1.11–1.64] | 176 (30.3) | 299 (51.6) | 105 (18.1) | 0.0015 |
| French non-obese subjects | 294 (42.4) | 400 (57.6) | 48 (13.8) | 198 (57.1) | 101 (29.1) | |||
| 1st set of French morbid obese subjects | 279 (51.1) | 267 (48.9) | 0.0022 | 1.42 [1.13–1.78] | 72 (26.4) | 135 (49.4) | 66 (24.2) | 0.0014 |
| 2nd set of French morbid obese subjects | 289 (46.8) | 329 (53.2) | 0.10 | 1.19 [0.96–1.49] | 69 (22.3) | 151 (48.9) | 89 (28.8) | 0.095 |
| Pooled set of French morbid obese subjects | 568 (48.8) | 596 (51.2) | 0.007 | 1.30 [1.07–1.57] | 141 (24.2) | 286 (49.1) | 155 (26.7) | 0.006 |
| French non-obese subjects | 656 (92.7) | 52 (7.3) | 304 (85.9) | 48 (13.6) | 2 (0.5) | |||
| 1st set of French morbid obese subjects | 520 (89.1) | 64 (10.9) | 0.02 | 1.53 [1.06–2.28] | 232 (79.4) | 56 (19.2) | 4 (1.4) | 0.02 |
| 2nd set of French morbid obese subjects | 590 (89.6) | 68 (10.4) | 0.05 | 1.45 [1.00–2.12] | 263 (80.0) | 64 (19.4) | 2 (0.6) | 0.048 |
| Pooled set of French morbid obese subjects | 1110 (89.4) | 132 (10.6) | 0.017 | 1.50 [1.07–2.10] | 495 (79.7) | 120 (19.3) | 6 (1.0) | 0.017 |
aNumber of alleles or genotypes (frequencies, %)
b p-value corresponds to association analysis between different French morbidly obese groups (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) and non-obese subjects (BMI<27 kg/m2).
c p-value is calculated by the Armitage's trend test.
"Risk" alleles underlined are those encountered more frequently in obese groups.
* Pooled set of 621 French morbidly obese subjects were composed of the first set of 292 French morbidly obese patients (BMI = 47.5 ± 7.8 kg/m2, age = 44.7 ± 10.8 years) and of a second set of 329 French morbidly obese patients (BMI = 48.1 ± 7.1 kg/m2, age = 48.5 ± 10.5 years).
Figure 3Histogram summarized the -3608T allele frequency in different groups of controls and obese subjects. Compared to French controls from type 2 Diabetes pedigrees and French controls from general population ; -3608T allele frequency was more frequent in the French moderate obese subjects (p = 0.011 and p = 0.14, respectively) and in the Swiss morbidly obese subjects (p = 0.002 and p = 0.078, respectively).
Figure 4Electrophoretic mobility shift assays for SNP-3608T>C with nuclear extracts prepared from RIN-1027-B2 cells. Four probes used for EMSA contained respectively -3608T-3607C, -3608C-3607C, -3608T-3607T and -3608C-3607T. Specific complex formations (compared lines 2 and 5) are indicated by two arrows. Lane 1 is radiolabeled probes without nuclear extract. In the presence of the -3608T allele and the -3607C allele, two bands (bands 1 and 2) were observed corresponding to the fixation of two different factors (lane 2). The intensity of the band 2 decreased when either of these two alleles was changed (lanes 6, 9 and 12 compared to lane 2). The band 2 decreased by 1.5 fold in a TT or a CT configuration (lanes 9 and 12) and completely disappeared in a CC configuration at both loci (lane 6). The intensity of the band 1 and 2 was decreased when non radioactive competitors (either C or T alleles at the -3608 locus) were added to the reaction (lanes 3 and 4 compared to lane 2). In the TT configuration at the two loci, the addition of the -3608C non labeled probe did not decrease the band 2 signal unlike the -3608T probe (lanes 10 and 11 compared to lane 9). These observations suggest that the band 2 corresponds to the binding of a putative nuclear protein when both the -3608T and the -3607C alleles are present. The band 1 was observed when at least one C allele was present at either locus, decreased by 2 fold in a TT configuration (lanes 2, 6, 12 compared to lane 9).
Figure 5Expression of nuclear proteins in untreated and tunicamycin-treated RIN-1027-B2 cells. GATA-3 and OCT-1 were specifically detected in RIN-untreated cells (lanes 3 and 4). For CHOP, a multiple band pattern was observed (lane 1). As tunicamycin induces endoplasmic stress in cells and consequently enhances CHOP expression, a western blot was performed with tunicamycin treated RIN-1027-B2 cells to determine which band corresponds to CHOP. As pointed by the arrow, the intensity of the band of 27 KDa increased in nuclear extracts from RIN-treated cells, indicating that the amount of CHOP nuclear protein was increased (lane 2 compared to lane 1).