Literature DB >> 15821620

A review of surgical simulation with attention to validation methodology.

John A Aucar1, Nicholas R Groch, Scott A Troxel, Steve W Eubanks.   

Abstract

The use of simulation technology for teaching and evaluating surgical skills has gained considerable attention in recent years. This is driven by interest in quality of care, concerns over increasing operative complexity, constraints on the use of animal models, limited available patient material, medicolegal pressures, and fiscal mandates for cost-effective performance. Traditional mechanical models are yielding to techniques dependent on electronic technology, including virtual reality. Data to support the validity of simulation techniques for surgical training, assessment, and certification represent only a fraction of the literature available on the subject. Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE and ERIC, covering the period from 1966 to the present. The electronic and bioengineering literature was not surveyed due to the extensive literature on technology development, distinct from assessment of context specific validity. The search results and the bibliographies of key review articles were examined to identify articles that contained original data, measured performance between cohorts, defined performance measures, and described a standard against which performance was compared. Most of the literature pertaining to simulation techniques for surgical training has been published within the past 5 years and consist of review, opinion, and feasibility articles. There is an emerging body of evidence to establish the validity of simulation techniques for assessing surgical skills. Further refinement of simulation techniques, identification of specific performance measures, longitudinal evaluations, and comparison to practice outcomes are still needed to establish the validity and the value of surgical simulation for teaching and assessing surgical skills prior to considering implementation for certification purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15821620     DOI: 10.1097/01.sle.0000160289.01159.0e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  11 in total

1.  Achieving Interface and Environment Fidelity in the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer.

Authors:  Amine Chellali; Helena Mentis; Amie Miller; Woojin Ahn; Venkata S Arikatla; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Stud       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.632

2.  Virtual reality technology and surgical training--a survey of general surgeons in Ireland.

Authors:  S A Early; G Roche-Nagle
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Building an efficient surgical team using a bench model simulation: construct validity of the Legacy Inanimate System for Endoscopic Team Training (LISETT).

Authors:  B Zheng; P M Denk; D V Martinec; P Gatta; M H Whiteford; L L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Validation of a virtual reality laparoscopic appendicectomy simulator: a novel process using cognitive task analysis.

Authors:  Sandeep Krishan Nayar; Liam Musto; Roland Fernandes; Rasiah Bharathan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Evaluation of robotic minimally invasive surgical skills using motion studies.

Authors:  Seung-Kook Jun; Madusudanan Sathia Narayanan; Pankaj Singhal; Sudha Garimella; Venkat Krovi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-07-14

6.  Virtual reality by mobile smartphone: improving child pedestrian safety.

Authors:  David C Schwebel; Joan Severson; Yefei He; Leslie A McClure
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.399

7.  Is carotid endarterectomy a trainee operation?

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Lutz; R Michael; B Gahl; H Savolainen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP Robot).

Authors:  Andrea Gavazzi; Ali N Bahsoun; Wim Van Haute; Kamran Ahmed; Oussama Elhage; Peter Jaye; M Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  The use of a virtual reality surgical simulator for cataract surgical skill assessment with 6 months of intervening operating room experience.

Authors:  Shameema Sikder; Jia Luo; P Pat Banerjee; Cristian Luciano; Patrick Kania; Jonathan C Song; Eman S Kahtani; Deepak P Edward; Abdul-Elah Al Towerki
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-20

10.  Research priorities in light of current trends in microsurgical training: revalidation, simulation, cross-training, and standardisation.

Authors:  Rebecca Spenser Nicholas; Rudo N Madada-Nyakauru; Renu Anita Irri; Simon Richard Myers; Ali Mahmoud Ghanem
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.