Literature DB >> 27585563

Virtual reality by mobile smartphone: improving child pedestrian safety.

David C Schwebel1, Joan Severson2, Yefei He2, Leslie A McClure3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pedestrian injuries are a leading cause of paediatric injury. Effective, practical and cost-efficient behavioural interventions to teach young children street crossing skills are needed. They must be empirically supported and theoretically based. Virtual reality (VR) offers promise to fill this need and teach child pedestrian safety skills for several reasons, including: (A) repeated unsupervised practice without risk of injury, (B) automated feedback on crossing success or failure, (C) tailoring to child skill levels: (D) appealing and fun training environment, and (E) most recently given technological advances, potential for broad dissemination using mobile smartphone technology. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Extending previous work, we will evaluate delivery of an immersive pedestrian VR using mobile smartphones and the Google Cardboard platform, technology enabling standard smartphones to function as immersive VR delivery systems. We will overcome limitations of previous research suggesting children learnt some pedestrian skills after six VR training sessions but did not master adult-level pedestrian skills by implementing a randomised non-inferiority trial with two equal-sized groups of children ages 7-8 years (total N=498). All children will complete baseline, postintervention and 6-month follow-up assessments of pedestrian safety and up to 25 30-min pedestrian safety training trials until they reach adult levels of functioning. Half the children will be randomly assigned to train in Google Cardboard and the other half in a semi-immersive kiosk VR. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) models will assess primary outcomes. DISCUSSION: If results are as hypothesised, mobile smartphones offer substantial potential to overcome barriers of dissemination and implementation and deliver pedestrian safety training to children worldwide. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27585563      PMCID: PMC5784423          DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  30 in total

1.  Some essential considerations in the design and conduct of non-inferiority trials.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; Katherine Odem-Davis; Mark D Rothmann; Yuan Li Shen
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Translational and clinical science--time for a new vision.

Authors:  Elias A Zerhouni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The influence of carrying a backpack on college student pedestrian safety.

Authors:  David C Schwebel; Danielle Dulion Pitts; Despina Stavrinos
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2009-01-25

4.  Distraction and pedestrian safety: how talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street.

Authors:  David C Schwebel; Despina Stavrinos; Katherine W Byington; Tiffany Davis; Elizabeth E O'Neal; Desiree de Jong
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2011-08-09

5.  Children's estimates of vehicle approach times.

Authors:  E R Hoffmann; A Payne; S Prescott
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Child pedestrian injury in an urban setting: descriptive epidemiology.

Authors:  Charles DiMaggio; Maureen Durkin
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods.

Authors:  B Jones; P Jarvis; J A Lewis; A F Ebbutt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06

8.  Differences in child pedestrian injury events by location.

Authors:  P F Agran; D G Winn; C L Anderson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Are school zones effective? An examination of motor vehicle versus child pedestrian crashes near schools.

Authors:  J Warsh; L Rothman; M Slater; C Steverango; A Howard
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.399

10.  Validation of virtual reality as a tool to understand and prevent child pedestrian injury.

Authors:  David C Schwebel; Joanna Gaines; Joan Severson
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2008-04-04
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Virtual Reality for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jiabin Shen; Sarah Johnson; Cheng Chen; Henry Xiang
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2018-02-06

2.  Is individual practice in an immersive and interactive virtual reality application non-inferior to practicing with traditional equipment in learning systematic clinical observation? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen Berg; Aslak Steinsbekk
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.463

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.