Literature DB >> 1582156

Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: achievements, limitations, and alternatives.

A S Meyer1.   

Abstract

Phonological encoding in language production can be defined as a set of processes generating utterance forms on the basis of semantic and syntactic information. Most evidence about these processes stems from analyses of sound errors. In section 1 of this paper, certain important results of these analyses are reviewed. Two prominent models of phonological encoding, which are mainly based on speech error evidence, are discussed in section 2. In section 3, limitations of speech error analyses are discussed, and it is argued that detailed and comprehensive models of phonological encoding cannot be derived solely on the basis of error analyses. As is argued in section 4, a new research strategy is required. Instead of using the properties of errors to draw inferences about the generation of correct word forms, future research should directly investigate the normal process of phonological encoding.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1582156     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90043-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  18 in total

1.  The time course of grammatical and phonological processing during speaking: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  M van Turennout; P Hagoort; C Brown
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1999-11

2.  Planning at the phonological level during sentence production.

Authors:  Tatiana T Schnur; Albert Costa; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-03

3.  Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors.

Authors:  Louis Goldstein; Marianne Pouplier; Larissa Chen; Elliot Saltzman; Dani Byrd
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-07-05

4.  Perceptual bias in speech error data collection: insights from Spanish speech errors.

Authors:  Elvira Pérez; Julio Santiago; Alfonso Palma; Padraig G O'Seaghdha
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2007-05

5.  Do nonword repetition errors in children with specific language impairment reflect a weakness in an unidentified skill specific to nonword repetition or a deficit in simultaneous processing?

Authors:  Klara Marton
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2006-10

6.  Language production: Methods and methodologies.

Authors:  K Bock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

7.  The syllable's role in word naming.

Authors:  L Ferrand; J Segui; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

8.  Phonetic basis of phonemic paraphasias in aphasia: Evidence for cascading activation.

Authors:  Kathleen Kurowski; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Linking speech errors and phonological grammars: Insights from Harmonic Grammar networks.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Robert Daland
Journal:  Phonology       Date:  2009

10.  To Lump or to Split? Possible Subtypes of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.