Literature DB >> 32420092

Validation of black blood late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for evaluation of myocardial infarction in patients with or without pathological Q-wave on electrocardiogram (ECG).

Linsheng Song1,2, Xiaohai Ma2, Xinxiang Zhao3, Lei Zhao4, Mark DeLano5, Yang Fan6, Bin Wu6, Aijia Lu2, Jie Tian2, Liping He7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pathological Q-wave (QW) is an important indicator of infarcted myocardial volume indicating a worse prognosis compared to non-Q-wave (NQW) infarctions. Traditional classification divides infarcts into transmural and non-transmural based on QW and NQW. This view has been challenged by the advent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MR imaging. Conventional LGE (Conv-LGE) detection of subendocardial MI is limited by bright blood pool. Dark Blood LGE imaging (DB-LGE) nulls the blood pool improving the conspicuity and accuracy of detection of subendocardial infarcts. We hypothesize that improved detection of subendocardial enhancement with DB-LGE will result in improved correlation of electrocardiogram (ECG) and extent of infarction.
METHODS: Sixty-four clinically confirmed infarction patients were enrolled in this prospective study. All the participants underwent cardiac MR imaging including conv-LGE and DB-LGE. Twelve-lead ECG were performed on the same day. The patients were divided into QW and NQW groups by one experienced cardiologist. MI quantitation was by MI% (the ratio of MI volume to whole myocardial volume) and transmural grading, compared using paired t-test and Wilcoxon-test, respectively. The image quality obtained by Conv-LGE and DB-LGE were evaluated according to the signal intensity ratio (SIR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).
RESULTS: Fifty-six subjects were enrolled in the final analysis [23 (41%) QW and 33 (59%) NQW infarcts]. For the QW cohort, both sequences classified infarcts as transmural in 21/23 (91%) subjects and subendocardial in 2/23 (9%). For the NQW cohort, both sequences classified infarcts as transmural in 16/33 (48%) subjects and subendocardial in 17/33 (52%). Using BB-LGE there were significant differences in detecting subendocardial infarcts in QW and NQW cohorts (Z=-5.85, P<0.001). The MI% of QW group was greater than in NQW group (24.2±10.3 vs.15.9±9.8, P=0.003). Compared to Conv-LGE, BB-LGE provided higher CNR and SIR between infarcted myocardium and blood pool (6.3±2.6 vs. 2.1±1.3, P<0.001; 5.4±1.9 vs. 1.3±0.2, P<0.001). BB-LGE detected more subendocardial infarcted segments in the QW group and NQW group (Z=-4.24, P<0.001; Z=-5.57, P<0.001). The larger MI% was displayed in BB-LGE than in Conv-LGE in both QW group and NQW group (24.2±10.3 vs. 22.6±10.3, P<0.001; 15.9±9.8 vs.14.6±9.6, P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional LGE, DB-LGE can provide more accurate detection and characterization of infarction in terms of transmurality and subendocardial extent. This is important for evaluating QW and NQW MIs. Due to nulling the high signal of blood pool, DB-LGE can effectively improve the identification of subendocardial MI which may be missed on conventional LGE. Therefore, in both QW and NQW MIs, DB-LGE detects more subendocardial MIs and larger MI% is found. This may facilitate more accurate quantitative MR assessment of both QW and NQW MIs and further empower LGE volume as a predictive biomarker. 2020 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial infarction (MI); black blood (BB); electrocardiogram (ECG); late gadolinium enhancement (LGE); scar

Year:  2020        PMID: 32420092      PMCID: PMC7225441          DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2019.12.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  37 in total

1.  How we perform delayed enhancement imaging.

Authors:  Raymond J Kim; Dipan J Shah; Robert M Judd
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  T(Rho) and magnetization transfer and INvErsion recovery (TRAMINER)-prepared imaging: A novel contrast-enhanced flow-independent dark-blood technique for the evaluation of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement in patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Wolfgang G Rehwald; U Joseph Schoepf; Pal Suranyi; Sheldon E Litwin; Carlo N De Cecco; Julian L Wichmann; Stefanie Mangold; Damiano Caruso; Stephen R Fuller; Richard R Bayer Nd; Akos Varga-Szemes
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Prognostic value of fragmented QRS on a 12-lead ECG in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Luc Lorgis; François Jourda; Olivier Hachet; Marianne Zeller; Aurelie Gudjoncik; Gilles Dentan; Karim Stamboul; Charles Guenancia; Laurent Mock; Yves Cottin
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Stimulated-echo acquisition mode (STEAM) MRI for black-blood delayed hyperenhanced myocardial imaging.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Robert G Weiss; Matthias Stuber; Dara L Kraitchman; Li Pan; Amy E Spooner; Nael F Osman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Early and 1-year clinical outcome of patients' evolving non-Q-wave versus Q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. Results from The TIMI II Study.

Authors:  F V Aguirre; L T Younis; B R Chaitman; A M Ross; R P McMahon; M J Kern; P B Berger; G Sopko; W J Rogers; L Shaw
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Dynamic changes of edema and late gadolinium enhancement after acute myocardial infarction and their relationship to functional recovery and salvage index.

Authors:  Erica Dall'Armellina; Nina Karia; Alistair C Lindsay; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Vanessa Ferreira; Matthew D Robson; Peter Kellman; Jane M Francis; Colin Forfar; Bernard D Prendergast; Adrian P Banning; Keith M Channon; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Stefan Neubauer; Robin P Choudhury
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement without additional magnetization preparation.

Authors:  Robert J Holtackers; Amedeo Chiribiri; Torben Schneider; David M Higgins; René M Botnar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar.

Authors:  Rohin Francis; Peter Kellman; Tushar Kotecha; Andrea Baggiano; Karl Norrington; Ana Martinez-Naharro; Sabrina Nordin; Daniel S Knight; Roby D Rakhit; Tim Lockie; Philip N Hawkins; James C Moon; Derek J Hausenloy; Hui Xue; Michael S Hansen; Marianna Fontana
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Clinical value of dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance without additional magnetization preparation.

Authors:  Robert J Holtackers; Caroline M Van De Heyning; Muhummad Sohaib Nazir; Imran Rashid; Ioannis Ntalas; Haseeb Rahman; René M Botnar; Amedeo Chiribiri
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  MultiContrast Delayed Enhancement (MCODE) improves detection of subendocardial myocardial infarction by late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a clinical validation study.

Authors:  W Patricia Bandettini; Peter Kellman; Christine Mancini; Oscar Julian Booker; Sujethra Vasu; Steve W Leung; Joel R Wilson; Sujata M Shanbhag; Marcus Y Chen; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.