Literature DB >> 15818501

Saccadic adaptation shifts the pre-saccadic attention focus.

Karine Doré-Mazars1, Thérèse Collins.   

Abstract

The well-documented phenomenon of the spatial coupling between saccadic programming and the orienting of attention refers to the fact that visual attention is directed toward the location that the eyes are aiming for. However, the question remains open as to whether saccades and attention are two independent processes that can be directed concurrently toward a common goal, or whether their relationship is tighter, with the motor components of the saccade program influencing the selection of the position towards which visual attention is directed. To investigate this issue, an experiment was carried out in which the initial saccade goal was dissociated from the final executed motor vector. This was done by using a saccadic adaptation paradigm and a discrimination task. Results showed that best perceptual performance, which is taken to be an indicator of the locus of visual attention, followed the motor modifications arising from saccadic adaptation. This suggests that visual attention is directed toward the actual saccade landing position and that the perceptual system must have access to information regarding the motor vector before saccade execution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15818501     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2221-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Illusory shifts in visual direction accompany adaptation of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  D O Bahcall; E Kowler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A neural model of saccadic eye movement control explains task-specific adaptation.

Authors:  G Gancarz; S Grossberg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A pathway in primate brain for internal monitoring of movements.

Authors:  Marc A Sommer; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  What the brain stem tells the frontal cortex. I. Oculomotor signals sent from superior colliculus to frontal eye field via mediodorsal thalamus.

Authors:  Marc A Sommer; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Gain adaptation of exogenous shifts of visual attention.

Authors:  Sally A McFadden; Afsheen Khan; Josh Wallman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Tirin Moore; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Changes in oculocentric visual direction induced by the recalibration of saccades.

Authors:  B G Moidell; H E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

9.  Adaptation to an altered relation between retinal image displacements and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  A Mack; R Fendrich; J Pleune
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Non-visual information does not drive saccade gain adaptation in monkeys.

Authors:  Teri Seeberger; Christopher Noto; Farrel Robinson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of old age and resource demand on double-step adaptation of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Milena Ilieva; Valentina Grigorova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Distorted object perception following whole-field adaptation of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Tyler W Garaas; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual target selection and motor planning define attentional enhancement at perceptual processing stages.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Tobias Heed; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  To look or not to look: dissociating presaccadic and covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Nina M Hanning; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 16.978

5.  Saccadic Adaptation Alters the Attentional Field.

Authors:  Farahnaz A Wick; Tyler W Garaas; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Associations and Dissociations between Oculomotor Readiness and Covert Attention.

Authors:  Soazig Casteau; Daniel T Smith
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-07

7.  The peri-saccadic perception of objects and space.

Authors:  Fred H Hamker; Marc Zirnsak; Dirk Calow; Markus Lappe
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Deployment of spatial attention without moving the eyes is boosted by oculomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Ouazna Habchi; Elodie Rey; Romain Mathieu; Christian Urquizar; Alessandro Farnè; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Visual attention is not deployed at the endpoint of averaging saccades.

Authors:  Luca Wollenberg; Heiner Deubel; Martin Szinte
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Transsaccadic perception is affected by saccade landing point deviations after saccadic adaptation.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Martijn J Schut; Jasper Fabius; Nathan Van der Stoep
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.