Literature DB >> 10664809

A neural model of saccadic eye movement control explains task-specific adaptation.

G Gancarz1, S Grossberg.   

Abstract

Multiple brain learning sites are needed to calibrate the accuracy of saccadic eye movements. This is true because saccades can be made reactively to visual cues, attentively to visual or auditory cues, or planned in response to memory cues using visual, parietal, and prefrontal cortex, as well as superior colliculus, cerebellum, and reticular formation. The organization of these sites can be probed by displacing a visual target during a saccade. The resulting adaptation typically shows incomplete and asymmetric transfer between different tasks. A neural model of saccadic system learning is developed to explain these data, as well as data about saccadic coordinate changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10664809     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00049-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Our eyes deviate away from a location where a distractor is expected to appear.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Saccadic adaptation shifts the pre-saccadic attention focus.

Authors:  Karine Doré-Mazars; Thérèse Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body.

Authors:  Konrad P Kording; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-13       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Binocular fusion and invariant category learning due to predictive remapping during scanning of a depthful scene with eye movements.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg; Karthik Srinivasan; Arash Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-14

5.  Mislocalization of flashed and stationary visual stimuli after adaptation of reactive and scanning saccades.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Where's Waldo? How perceptual, cognitive, and emotional brain processes cooperate during learning to categorize and find desired objects in a cluttered scene.

Authors:  Hung-Cheng Chang; Stephen Grossberg; Yongqiang Cao
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-17

7.  Eye movement sequence generation in humans: Motor or goal updating?

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Wilsaan M Joiner; Edmond J Fitzgibbon; Lance M Optican; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Desirability, availability, credit assignment, category learning, and attention: Cognitive-emotional and working memory dynamics of orbitofrontal, ventrolateral, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Brain Neurosci Adv       Date:  2018-05-08

9.  The resonant brain: How attentive conscious seeing regulates action sequences that interact with attentive cognitive learning, recognition, and prediction.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Resonant Cholinergic Dynamics in Cognitive and Motor Decision-Making: Attention, Category Learning, and Choice in Neocortex, Superior Colliculus, and Optic Tectum.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg; Jesse Palma; Massimiliano Versace
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.