Literature DB >> 10476963

Illusory shifts in visual direction accompany adaptation of saccadic eye movements.

D O Bahcall1, E Kowler.   

Abstract

A central problem in human vision is to explain how the visual world remains stable despite the continual displacements of the retinal image produced by rapid saccadic movements of the eyes. Perceived stability has been attributed to 'efferent-copy' signals, representing the saccadic motor commands, that cancel the effects of saccade-related retinal displacements. Here we show, by means of a perceptual illusion, that traditional cancellation theories cannot explain stability. The perceptual illusion was produced by first inducing adaptive changes in saccadic gain (ratio of saccade size to target eccentricity). Following adaptation, subjects experienced an illusory mislocalization in which widely separated targets flashed before and after saccades appeared to be in the same place. The illusion shows that the perceptual system did not take the adaptive changes into account. Perceptual localization is based on signals representing the size of the initially-intended saccade, not the size of the saccade that is ultimately executed. Signals representing intended saccades initiate a visual comparison process used to maintain perceptual stability across saccades and to generate the oculomotor error signals that ensure saccadic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10476963     DOI: 10.1038/23693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  32 in total

1.  Modulation of activity in temporal cortex during generation of inner speech.

Authors:  Sukhwinder S Shergill; Michael J Brammer; Rimmei Fukuda; Ed Bullmore; Edson Amaro; Robin M Murray; Philip K McGuire
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The relative importance of retinal error and prediction in saccadic adaptation.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Saccadic adaptation shifts the pre-saccadic attention focus.

Authors:  Karine Doré-Mazars; Thérèse Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body.

Authors:  Konrad P Kording; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-13       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The relationship between spatial pooling and attention in saccadic and perceptual tasks.

Authors:  Elias H Cohen; Brian S Schnitzer; Timothy M Gersch; Manish Singh; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Fusion of visual and auditory stimuli during saccades: a Bayesian explanation for perisaccadic distortions.

Authors:  Paola Binda; Aurelio Bruno; David C Burr; Maria C Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  What is adapted in saccadic adaptation?

Authors:  Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Saccade adaptation specific to visual context.

Authors:  James P Herman; Mark R Harwood; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Adaptation of reactive and voluntary saccades: different patterns of adaptation revealed in the antisaccade task.

Authors:  Julien Cotti; Muriel Panouilleres; Douglas P Munoz; Jean-Louis Vercher; Denis Pélisson; Alain Guillaume
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  How does saccade adaptation affect visual perception?

Authors:  Teresa D Hernandez; Carmel A Levitan; Martin S Banks; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.