Literature DB >> 15818486

A validation study of the WHO analgesic ladder: a two-step vs three-step strategy.

Marco Maltoni1, Emanuela Scarpi, Caterina Modonesi, Alessandro Passardi, Sebastiano Calpona, Adriana Turriziani, Raffaella Speranza, Davide Tassinari, Pierantonio Magnani, Denis Saccani, Luigi Montanari, Britt Roudnas, Dino Amadori, Laura Fabbri, Oriana Nanni, Paola Raulli, Barbara Poggi, Francesca Fochessati, Donatella Giannunzio, Maria Lucia Barbagallo, Vincenzo Minnotti, Maura Betti, Stefano Giordani, Elena Piazza, Roberto Scapaticci, Sabrina Ferrario.   

Abstract

GOALS OF WORK: The aims of the present study were to verify whether an innovative therapeutic strategy for the treatment of mild-moderate chronic cancer pain, passing directly from step I to step III of the WHO analgesic ladder, is more effective than the traditional three-step strategy and to evaluate the tolerability and therapeutic index in both strategies.
METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older with multiple viscera or bone metastases or with locally advanced disease were randomized. Pain intensity was assessed using a 0-10 numerical rating scale based on four questions selected from the validated Italian version of the Brief Pain Inventory. Treatment-specific variables and other symptoms were recorded at baseline up to a maximum follow-up of 90 days per patient.
RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were randomized onto the study, and pain intensity was assessed over a period of 2,649 days. The innovative treatment presented a statistically significant advantage over the traditional strategy in terms of the percentage of days with worst pain > or =5 (22.8 vs 28.6%, p < 0.001) and > or =7 (8.6 vs 11.2%, p = 0.023). Grades 3 and 4 anorexia and constipation were more frequently reported in the innovative strategy arm, although prophylactic laxative therapy was used less in this setting.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data would seem to suggest that a direct move to the third step of the WHO analgesic ladder is feasible and could reduce some pain scores but also requires careful management of side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15818486     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-005-0807-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  19 in total

Review 1.  Cancer pain relief and palliative care. Report of a WHO Expert Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1990

2.  Implementing guidelines for cancer pain management: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  S L Du Pen; A R Du Pen; N Polissar; J Hansberry; B M Kraybill; M Stillman; J Panke; R Everly; K Syrjala
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief.

Authors:  V Ventafridda; M Tamburini; A Caraceni; F De Conno; F Naldi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Symptoms during cancer pain treatment following WHO-guidelines: a longitudinal follow-up study of symptom prevalence, severity and etiology.

Authors:  T Meuser; C Pietruck; L Radbruch; P Stute; K A Lehmann; S Grond
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Transdermal fentanyl in opioid-naive cancer pain patients: an open trial using transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of chronic cancer pain in opioid-naive patients and a group using codeine.

Authors:  A P Vielvoye-Kerkmeer; C Mattern; M P Uitendaal
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  High-dose tramadol in comparison to low-dose morphine for cancer pain relief.

Authors:  S Grond; L Radbruch; T Meuser; G Loick; R Sabatowski; K A Lehmann
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 7.  The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain management. Stepping up the quality of its evaluation.

Authors:  A R Jadad; G P Browman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Description of a mechanistic approach to pain management in advanced cancer. Preliminary report.

Authors:  M A Ashby; B G Fleming; M Brooksbank; B Rounsefell; W B Runciman; K Jackson; N Muirden; M Smith
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; R Gonin; A K Hatfield; J H Edmonson; R H Blum; J A Stewart; K J Pandya
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for cancer pain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Eisenberg; C S Berkey; D B Carr; F Mosteller; T C Chalmers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  18 in total

1.  Physicians' self-assessment of cancer pain treatment skills--more training required.

Authors:  M Silvoniemi; T Vasankari; T Vahlberg; E Vuorinen; K E Clemens; E Salminen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Treatment of cancer pain: Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Juan A Virizuela; Yolanda Escobar; Javier Cassinello; Pablo Borrega
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Prostate cancer pain management: EAU guidelines on pain management.

Authors:  Pia Bader; Dieter Echtle; Valerie Fonteyne; Kostas Livadas; Gert De Meerleer; Alvaro Paez Borda; Eleni G Papaioannou; Jan H Vranken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Long-term low-dose morphine for patients with moderate cancer pain is predominant factor effecting clinically meaningful pain reduction.

Authors:  Ru-Jun Zheng; Yan Fu; Jiang Zhu; Jiu-Ping Xu; Qiu-Fen Xiang; Lin Chen; Hua Zhong; Jun-Ying Li; Chun-Hua Yu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Cancer Pain Management and Bone Metastases: An Update for the Clinician.

Authors:  Guido Schneider; Raymond Voltz; Jan Gaertner
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Ensuring pain relief for children at the end of life.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Grégoire; Gerri Frager
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 7.  Effectiveness of the World Health Organization cancer pain relief guidelines: an integrative review.

Authors:  Cathy L Carlson
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Advantages of an etiology-based method for treating cancer pain: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xiaojia Wang; Yu Li; Bangxiang Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

9.  Consumption trend and prescription pattern of opioid analgesics in China from 2006 to 2015.

Authors:  Wentong Fang; Tingting Liu; Zhongsheng Gu; Qian Li; Can Luo
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-01-27

10.  Pain in castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Adam Gater; Linda Abetz-Webb; Clare Battersby; Bhash Parasuraman; Stuart McIntosh; Faith Nathan; Elisabeth C Piault
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.