Literature DB >> 3802043

A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief.

V Ventafridda, M Tamburini, A Caraceni, F De Conno, F Naldi.   

Abstract

The method for cancer pain relief proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) consists of guidelines for a three-step treatment, from non-opioids to weak and then strong opioids, according to need. Adjuvant drugs can be added to each step. This report presents the 2-year experience of the WHO Collaborating Centre at the National Cancer Institute of Milan in the use of this method. This retrospective study shows that a correct use of the analgesic ladder can reduce pain to a third of its initial intensity. The use of non-opioids had an average duration of 19.2 days; in 52% of the cases treatment was discontinued due to inefficacy and in 42%, to side effects. Weak opioids were administered on an average for 28.0 days. A shift to Strong opioids was made in 92% of the cases due to inefficacy and in 8% because of side effects. Treatment with strong opioids lasted for an average of 46.6 days and can be considered the mainstay of cancer pain therapy. Performance status was not altered considerably during the study and hours of sleep were doubled. The analgesic ladder proved efficacious in 71% of the cases. Neurolytic procedures had to be used in 29%. The authors conclude that analgesics, as proposed by WHO, are the most suitable treatment arm in controlling pain in palliative treatment for advanced cancer patients. Lack of availability or underuse of opioids constitute the real obstacle to the application of this method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3802043     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870215)59:4<850::aid-cncr2820590432>3.0.co;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  103 in total

Review 1.  Palliative care for HIV disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  B Greenberg; R McCorkle; D Vlahov; P A Selwyn
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Physicians' self-assessment of cancer pain treatment skills--more training required.

Authors:  M Silvoniemi; T Vasankari; T Vahlberg; E Vuorinen; K E Clemens; E Salminen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Management of cancer pain.

Authors:  Sebastiano Mercadante
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Piroxicam and doxepin--an alternative to narcotic analgesics in managing advanced cancer pain.

Authors:  M L Cohn; A F Machado; R Bier; M Cohn
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-03

Review 5.  Strong opioids in pediatric palliative medicine.

Authors:  Richard D W Hain; Angela Miser; Mary Devins; W Hamish B Wallace
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  The role of opioids in cancer pain.

Authors:  Columba Quigley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-08

7.  Gaps and junctions between clinical experience and theoretical framework in the use of opioids.

Authors:  Marianne Kloke
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Treatment with methylnaltrexone is associated with increased survival in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  F Janku; L K Johnson; D D Karp; J T Atkins; P A Singleton; J Moss
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Effectiveness of the World Health Organization cancer pain relief guidelines: an integrative review.

Authors:  Cathy L Carlson
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 10.  Management of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Leeroy William; Rod Macleod
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.