Literature DB >> 1283009

Description of a mechanistic approach to pain management in advanced cancer. Preliminary report.

M A Ashby1, B G Fleming, M Brooksbank, B Rounsefell, W B Runciman, K Jackson, N Muirden, M Smith.   

Abstract

A mechanistic approach to advanced cancer pain management is proposed, based on the clinically perceived anatomical and pathophysiological mechanisms of pain generation. It is an extension of the World Health Organisation (WHO) analgesic ladder in which severity of pain is the principal determinant of analgesic choice. The mechanistic categories are: superficial somatic, deep somatic, visceral and neurogenic (mixed or pure, i.e., nociceptive component present or absent). Allocation of pain to the different categories is based on clinical history, physical findings and investigations to establish the site and extent of active primary or metastatic tumor deposits, and evidence of previous response to medication. Drug choice sequence is determined by the dominant pain mechanism judged to be present and not the severity of the pain. In order to describe this approach, mechanisms of pain, disease distribution and drug treatment have been analysed in the first 20 consecutive patients who consented to enter a longitudinal pain description and evaluation study on admission to an inpatient hospice unit. Despite a high exclusion rate from research standard monitoring due to severity of illness and related factors, the majority of eligible patients approached to enter the study did so, and the pain scoring was well tolerated. The implications of this for future research and clinical practice are discussed. In 6 patients only 1 pain mechanism was identified (visceral 4, deep somatic 2). Two mechanisms were present in 8 patients and 3 mechanisms in 6 patients. The deep somatic mechanism was identified in 15 patients, visceral mechanism in 13, neurogenic in 10 and superficial somatic in 2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1283009     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90256-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  4 in total

1.  A validation study of the WHO analgesic ladder: a two-step vs three-step strategy.

Authors:  Marco Maltoni; Emanuela Scarpi; Caterina Modonesi; Alessandro Passardi; Sebastiano Calpona; Adriana Turriziani; Raffaella Speranza; Davide Tassinari; Pierantonio Magnani; Denis Saccani; Luigi Montanari; Britt Roudnas; Dino Amadori; Laura Fabbri; Oriana Nanni; Paola Raulli; Barbara Poggi; Francesca Fochessati; Donatella Giannunzio; Maria Lucia Barbagallo; Vincenzo Minnotti; Maura Betti; Stefano Giordani; Elena Piazza; Roberto Scapaticci; Sabrina Ferrario
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Pharmacological options for the management of refractory cancer pain-what is the evidence?

Authors:  B Afsharimani; K Kindl; P Good; J Hardy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Value of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the assessment of ascites syndrome.

Authors:  Simona Bota; Ioan Sporea; Roxana Sirli; Alina Popescu; Mirela Dănilă; Mădălina Sendroiu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-08-28

Review 4.  Systematic review of the efficacy of antiemetics in the treatment of nausea in patients with far-advanced cancer.

Authors:  Paul Glare; Glenn Pereira; Linda J Kristjanson; Martin Stockler; Martin Tattersall
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-04-24       Impact factor: 3.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.