Literature DB >> 15817647

Processing of modulated sounds in the zebra finch auditory midbrain: responses to noise, frequency sweeps, and sinusoidal amplitude modulations.

Sarah M N Woolley1, John H Casseday.   

Abstract

The avian auditory midbrain nucleus, the mesencephalicus lateralis, dorsalis (MLd), is the first auditory processing stage in which multiple parallel inputs converge, and it provides the input to the auditory thalamus. We studied the responses of single MLd neurons to four types of modulated sounds: 1) white noise; 2) band-limited noise; 3) frequency modulated (FM) sweeps, and 4) sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones (SAM) in adult male zebra finches. Responses were compared with the responses of the same neurons to pure tones in terms of temporal response patterns, thresholds, characteristic frequencies, frequency tuning bandwidths, tuning sharpness, and spike rate/intensity relationships. Most neurons responded well to noise. More than one-half of the neurons responded selectively to particular portions of the noise, suggesting that, unlike forebrain neurons, many MLd neurons can encode specific acoustic components of highly modulated sounds such as noise. Selectivity for FM sweep direction was found in only 13% of cells that responded to sweeps. Those cells also showed asymmetric tuning curves, suggesting that asymmetric inhibition plays a role in FM directional selectivity. Responses to SAM showed that MLd neurons code temporal modulation rates using both spike rate and synchronization. Nearly all cells showed low-pass or band-pass filtering properties for SAM. Best modulation frequencies matched the temporal modulations in zebra finch song. Results suggest that auditory midbrain neurons are well suited for encoding a wide range of complex sounds with a high degree of temporal accuracy rather than selectively responding to only some sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15817647     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01064.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  35 in total

1.  Automating the design of informative sequences of sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Jeremy Lewi; David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  FM-selective networks in human auditory cortex revealed using fMRI and multivariate pattern classification.

Authors:  I-Hui Hsieh; Paul Fillmore; Feng Rong; Gregory Hickok; Kourosh Saberi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Stimulus-dependent auditory tuning results in synchronous population coding of vocalizations in the songbird midbrain.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Patrick R Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Linear and nonlinear auditory response properties of interneurons in a high-order avian vocal motor nucleus during wakefulness.

Authors:  Jonathan N Raksin; Christopher M Glaze; Sarah Smith; Marc F Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Efficient encoding of vocalizations in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Lars A Holmstrom; Lonneke B M Eeuwes; Patrick D Roberts; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  DSCF neurons within the primary auditory cortex of the mustached bat process frequency modulations present within social calls.

Authors:  Stuart D Washington; Jagmeet S Kanwal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Anesthetic state modulates excitability but not spectral tuning or neural discrimination in single auditory midbrain neurons.

Authors:  Joseph W Schumacher; David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Discrimination of communication vocalizations by single neurons and groups of neurons in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Heterogeneity of intrinsic biophysical properties among cochlear nucleus neurons improves the population coding of temporal information.

Authors:  J Ahn; L J Kreeger; S T Lubejko; D A Butts; K M MacLeod
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.