Literature DB >> 24623512

Heterogeneity of intrinsic biophysical properties among cochlear nucleus neurons improves the population coding of temporal information.

J Ahn1, L J Kreeger1, S T Lubejko1, D A Butts2, K M MacLeod3.   

Abstract

Reliable representation of the spectrotemporal features of an acoustic stimulus is critical for sound recognition. However, if all neurons respond with identical firing to the same stimulus, redundancy in the activity patterns would reduce the information capacity of the population. We thus investigated spike reliability and temporal fluctuation coding in an ensemble of neurons recorded in vitro from the avian auditory brain stem. Sequential patch-clamp recordings were made from neurons of the cochlear nucleus angularis while injecting identical filtered Gaussian white noise currents, simulating synaptic drive. The spiking activity in neurons receiving these identically fluctuating stimuli was highly correlated, measured pairwise across neurons and as a pseudo-population. Two distinct uncorrelated noise stimuli could be discriminated using the temporal patterning, but not firing rate, of the spike trains in the neural ensemble, with best discrimination using information at time scales of 5-20 ms. Despite high cross-correlation values, the spike patterns observed in individual neurons were idiosyncratic, with notable heterogeneity across neurons. To investigate how temporal information is being encoded, we used optimal linear reconstruction to produce an estimate of the original current stimulus from the spike trains. Ensembles of trains sampled across the neural population could be used to predict >50% of the stimulus variation using optimal linear decoding, compared with ∼20% using the same number of spike trains recorded from single neurons. We conclude that heterogeneity in the intrinsic biophysical properties of cochlear nucleus neurons reduces firing pattern redundancy while enhancing representation of temporal information.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  cochlear nucleus; optimal linear decoding; reconstruction; spectrotemporal; temporal coding

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24623512      PMCID: PMC4097873          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00836.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  68 in total

Review 1.  Information theory and neural coding.

Authors:  A Borst; F E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Intrinsic neuronal properties of the chick nucleus angularis.

Authors:  Daphne Soares; Raymond A Chitwood; Richard L Hyson; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A circuit for coding interaural time differences in the chick brainstem.

Authors:  E M Overholt; E W Rubel; R L Hyson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Anne Hsu; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Action potential timing precision in dorsal cochlear nucleus pyramidal cells.

Authors:  Sarah E Street; Paul B Manis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Efficient encoding of vocalizations in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Lars A Holmstrom; Lonneke B M Eeuwes; Patrick D Roberts; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  M E Warchol; P Dallos
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  A neural cocktail-party processor.

Authors:  C von der Malsburg; W Schneider
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Variable synaptic strengths controls the firing rate distribution in feedforward neural networks.

Authors:  Cheng Ly; Gary Marsat
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Spike threshold adaptation diversifies neuronal operating modes in the auditory brain stem.

Authors:  Susan T Lubejko; Bertrand Fontaine; Sara E Soueidan; Katrina M MacLeod
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Kv1 channels regulate variations in spike patterning and temporal reliability in the avian cochlear nucleus angularis.

Authors:  James F Baldassano; Katrina M MacLeod
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Efficient information coding and degeneracy in the nervous system.

Authors:  Pavithraa Seenivasan; Rishikesh Narayanan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 7.070

5.  A biophysical modelling platform of the cochlear nucleus and other auditory circuits: From channels to networks.

Authors:  Paul B Manis; Luke Campagnola
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Stable encoding of sounds over a broad range of statistical parameters in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jennifer M Blackwell; Thibaud O Taillefumier; Ryan G Natan; Isaac M Carruthers; Marcelo O Magnasco; Maria N Geffen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Systematic Analysis of Transmitter Coexpression Reveals Organizing Principles of Local Interneuron Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Kristyn M Lizbinski; Gary Marsat; Andrew M Dacks
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-10-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.