OBJECTIVES: To determine whether severity of subclinical brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities predicts incident self-reported physical impairment or rate of decline in motor performance. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis, average follow-up time: 4.0 years. SETTING: Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). PARTICIPANTS: CHS participants with modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) score of 80 or greater, no self-reported disability, no history of stroke, and at least one assessment of mobility (n=2,450, mean age=74.4). MEASUREMENTS: Brain MRI abnormalities (ventricular enlargement, white matter hyperintensities, subcortical and basal ganglia small brain infarcts), self-reported physical impairment (difficulty walking half a mile or with one or more activities of daily living), and motor performance (gait speed, timed chair stand). RESULTS: After adjusting for demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and diseases, risk of incident self-reported physical impairment was 35% greater for those with severe ventricular enlargement than for those with minimal ventricular enlargement, 22% greater for those with moderate white matter hyperintensities than for those with minimal white matter hyperintensities, and 26% greater for participants with at least one brain infarct than for those with no infarcts. Those with moderate to severe brain abnormalities experienced faster gait speed decline (0.02 m/s per year) than those with no MRI abnormalities (0.01 m/s per year). Further adjustment for incident stroke, incident dementia, and 3MS score did not substantially attenuate hazard ratios for incident self-reported physical impairment or coefficients for decline in gait speed. CONCLUSION: Subclinical structural brain abnormalities in high-functioning older adults can increase the risk of developing physical disabilities and declining in motor performance.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether severity of subclinical brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities predicts incident self-reported physical impairment or rate of decline in motor performance. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis, average follow-up time: 4.0 years. SETTING: Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). PARTICIPANTS: CHSparticipants with modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) score of 80 or greater, no self-reported disability, no history of stroke, and at least one assessment of mobility (n=2,450, mean age=74.4). MEASUREMENTS: Brain MRI abnormalities (ventricular enlargement, white matter hyperintensities, subcortical and basal ganglia small brain infarcts), self-reported physical impairment (difficulty walking half a mile or with one or more activities of daily living), and motor performance (gait speed, timed chair stand). RESULTS: After adjusting for demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and diseases, risk of incident self-reported physical impairment was 35% greater for those with severe ventricular enlargement than for those with minimal ventricular enlargement, 22% greater for those with moderate white matter hyperintensities than for those with minimal white matter hyperintensities, and 26% greater for participants with at least one brain infarct than for those with no infarcts. Those with moderate to severe brain abnormalities experienced faster gait speed decline (0.02 m/s per year) than those with no MRI abnormalities (0.01 m/s per year). Further adjustment for incident stroke, incident dementia, and 3MS score did not substantially attenuate hazard ratios for incident self-reported physical impairment or coefficients for decline in gait speed. CONCLUSION: Subclinical structural brain abnormalities in high-functioning older adults can increase the risk of developing physical disabilities and declining in motor performance.
Authors: Caterina Rosano; Stephanie A Studenski; Howard J Aizenstein; Robert M Boudreau; William T Longstreth; Anne B Newman Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Patrick J Sparto; Howard J Aizenstein; Jessie M Vanswearingen; Caterina Rosano; Subashan Perera; Stephanie A Studenski; Joseph M Furman; Mark S Redfern Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2008-06-11 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Stephen F Smagula; Charles F Reynolds; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Thuy-Tien Dam; Jan M Hughes-Austin; Misti Paudel; Susan Redline; Katie L Stone; Jane A Cauley Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Celia F Hybels; Carl F Pieper; Lawrence R Landerman; Martha E Payne; David C Steffens Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Barbara Waag Carlson; Virginia J Neelon; John R Carlson; Marilyn Hartman; Sunil Dogra Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.522
Authors: Marco Inzitari; Stephanie Studenski; Caterina Rosano; Neil A Zakai; William T Longstreth; Mary Cushman; Anne B Newman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-09-22 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Chendi Cui; Akira Sekikawa; Lewis H Kuller; Oscar L Lopez; Anne B Newman; Allison L Kuipers; Rachel H Mackey Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Sara J Francois; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Sandra Gilmore; Subashan Perera; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: PM R Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 2.298