BACKGROUND: Slower gait in older adults is related to smaller volume of the prefrontal area (PFAv). The pathways underlying this association have not yet been explored. Understanding slowing gait could help improve function in older age. We examine whether the association between smaller PFAv and slower gait is explained by lower performance on numerous neuropsychological tests. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesise that slower information processing explains this association, while tests of language or memory will not. METHODS: Data on brain imaging, neuropsychological tests (information processing speed, visuospatial attention, memory, language, mood) and time to walk 15 feet were obtained in 214 adults (73.3 years, 62% women) free from stroke and dementia. Covariates included central (white matter hyperintensities, vision) and peripheral contributors of gait (vibration sense, muscle strength, arthritis, body mass index), demographics (age, race, gender, education), as well as markers of prevalent vascular diseases (cardiovascular disease, diabetes and ankle arm index). RESULTS: In linear regression models, smaller PFAv was associated with slower time to walk independent of covariates. This association was no longer significant after adding information processing speed to the model. None of the other neuropsychological tests significantly attenuated this association. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that smaller PFAv may contribute to slower gait through slower information processing. Future longitudinal studies are warranted to examine the casual relationship between focal brain atrophy with slowing in information processing and gait.
BACKGROUND: Slower gait in older adults is related to smaller volume of the prefrontal area (PFAv). The pathways underlying this association have not yet been explored. Understanding slowing gait could help improve function in older age. We examine whether the association between smaller PFAv and slower gait is explained by lower performance on numerous neuropsychological tests. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesise that slower information processing explains this association, while tests of language or memory will not. METHODS: Data on brain imaging, neuropsychological tests (information processing speed, visuospatial attention, memory, language, mood) and time to walk 15 feet were obtained in 214 adults (73.3 years, 62% women) free from stroke and dementia. Covariates included central (white matter hyperintensities, vision) and peripheral contributors of gait (vibration sense, muscle strength, arthritis, body mass index), demographics (age, race, gender, education), as well as markers of prevalent vascular diseases (cardiovascular disease, diabetes and ankle arm index). RESULTS: In linear regression models, smaller PFAv was associated with slower time to walk independent of covariates. This association was no longer significant after adding information processing speed to the model. None of the other neuropsychological tests significantly attenuated this association. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that smaller PFAv may contribute to slower gait through slower information processing. Future longitudinal studies are warranted to examine the casual relationship between focal brain atrophy with slowing in information processing and gait.
Authors: D G Ives; A L Fitzpatrick; D E Bild; B M Psaty; L H Kuller; P M Crowley; R G Cruise; S Theroux Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: L H Kuller; L Shemanski; T Manolio; M Haan; L Fried; N Bryan; G L Burke; R Tracy; R Bhadelia Journal: Stroke Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: J M Guralnik; A Z LaCroix; R D Abbott; L F Berkman; S Satterfield; D A Evans; R B Wallace Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1993-04-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Oscar L Lopez; Lewis H Kuller; Annette Fitzpatrick; Diane Ives; James T Becker; Norman Beauchamp Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Neelesh K Nadkarni; Karen A Nunley; Howard Aizenstein; Tamara B Harris; Kristine Yaffe; Suzanne Satterfield; Anne B Newman; Caterina Rosano Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Manuel M Montero-Odasso; Yanina Sarquis-Adamson; Mark Speechley; Michael J Borrie; Vladimir C Hachinski; Jennie Wells; Patricia M Riccio; Marcelo Schapira; Ervin Sejdic; Richard M Camicioli; Robert Bartha; William E McIlroy; Susan Muir-Hunter Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Christina E Hugenschmidt; Jonathan H Burdette; Ashley R Morgan; Jeff D Williamson; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Paul J Laurienti Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 6.053