BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing problem in the United States, and attenuation artifacts are more prevalent in this patient group. This study evaluated the impact of attenuation correction in patients with a high body mass index (BMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Three readers interpreted gated attenuation-corrected and non-attenuation-corrected rest/stress technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging results in 116 patients (BMI <30, n = 60; BMI > or =30, n = 56) who had coronary angiography no more than 60 days after imaging. Readers were blinded to all clinical information and as to whether myocardial perfusion imaging was attenuation-corrected or non-attenuation-corrected. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection of coronary artery disease of 70% or greater for attenuation-corrected versus non-attenuation-corrected single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were 86% versus 89%, 79% versus 50%, and 84% versus 79%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for attenuation-corrected versus non-attenuation-corrected SPECT for patients with BMI less than 30 were 90% versus 90%, 82% versus 64%, and 88% versus 85%, respectively. For BMI of 30 or greater, the results were 82% versus 87%, 76% versus 41%, and 80% versus 73%, respectively. There was a significant difference in specificity overall ( P = .02) and for the category of BMI of 30 or greater ( P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that electrocardiography-gated attenuation-corrected Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging improves specificity compared with electrocardiography-gated non-attenuation-corrected SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, especially in patients with BMI of 30 or greater.
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing problem in the United States, and attenuation artifacts are more prevalent in this patient group. This study evaluated the impact of attenuation correction in patients with a high body mass index (BMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Three readers interpreted gated attenuation-corrected and non-attenuation-corrected rest/stress technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging results in 116 patients (BMI <30, n = 60; BMI > or =30, n = 56) who had coronary angiography no more than 60 days after imaging. Readers were blinded to all clinical information and as to whether myocardial perfusion imaging was attenuation-corrected or non-attenuation-corrected. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection of coronary artery disease of 70% or greater for attenuation-corrected versus non-attenuation-corrected single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were 86% versus 89%, 79% versus 50%, and 84% versus 79%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for attenuation-corrected versus non-attenuation-corrected SPECT for patients with BMI less than 30 were 90% versus 90%, 82% versus 64%, and 88% versus 85%, respectively. For BMI of 30 or greater, the results were 82% versus 87%, 76% versus 41%, and 80% versus 73%, respectively. There was a significant difference in specificity overall ( P = .02) and for the category of BMI of 30 or greater ( P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that electrocardiography-gated attenuation-corrected Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging improves specificity compared with electrocardiography-gated non-attenuation-corrected SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, especially in patients with BMI of 30 or greater.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael K O'connor; Brad Kemp; Frank Anstett; Paul Christian; Edward P Ficaro; Eric Frey; Mark Jacobs; James N Kritzman; Robert A Pooley; Michael Wilk Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Mathew Shotwell; Balkrishna M Singh; Charlotte Fortman; Brian D Bauman; Jennifer Lukes; Myron C Gerson Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Piotr J Slomka; Mathews B Fish; Santiago Lorenzo; Hidetaka Nishina; James Gerlach; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Daniel S Berman; Xingping Kang; Hidetaka Nishina; Piotr J Slomka; Leslee J Shaw; Sean W Hayes; Ishac Cohen; John D Friedman; James Gerlach; Guido Germano Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: W Lane Duvall; Lori B Croft; Jared S Corriel; Andrew J Einstein; Jonathan E Fisher; Pilar S Haynes; Randi K Rose; Milena J Henzlova Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952