Literature DB >> 15811997

Optimization of cholesterol removal by probiotics in the presence of prebiotics by using a response surface method.

M T Liong1, N P Shah.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus casei ASCC 292 was grown in the presence of six prebiotics, namely, sorbitol, mannitol, maltodextrin, high-amylose maize, fructooligosaccharide (FOS), and inulin, in order to determine the combination of probiotic and prebiotics that would remove the highest level of cholesterol. A first-order model showed that the combination of L. casei ASCC 292, FOS, and maltodextrin was the most efficient for the removal of cholesterol, and the optimum experimental region was developed by using the steepest ascent. This led to the middle points of probiotic (1.70% [wt/vol]), FOS (4.80% [wt/vol]), and maltodextrin (6.80% [wt/vol]) for the development of a central composite design for optimization. Perturbation plot, response surface, and coefficient estimates showed that all three factors had significant quadratic effects on cholesterol removal, with FOS showing the most conspicuous quadratic change. A second-order polynomial regression model estimated that the optimum condition of the factors for cholesterol removal by L. casei ASCC 292 is 1.71% (wt/vol) probiotic, 4.95% (wt/vol) FOS, and 6.62% (wt/vol) maltodextrin. Validation experiments showed that the predicted optimum conditions were more efficient than the high and low levels of the factors and the center points. A response surface method proved reliable for developing the model, optimizing factors, and analyzing interaction effects. Analyses of growth, substrate utilization, growth yield, mean doubling time, and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production by the use of quadratic models indicated that cholesterol removal was growth associated. The concentration of L. casei ASCC 292 had the most significant quadratic effect on all responses studied, except for substrate utilization and SCFA production, which were significantly (P < 0.05) influenced by the interactions between the probiotic and both prebiotics, indicating that they were closely associated with the uptake of prebiotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15811997      PMCID: PMC1082510          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1745-1753.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

Review 1.  Prebiotic digestion and fermentation.

Authors:  J H Cummings; G T Macfarlane; H N Englyst
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Considerations for use of probiotic bacteria to modulate human health.

Authors:  M E Sanders
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Determination of cholesterol using o-phthalaldehyde.

Authors:  L L Rudel; M D Morris
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 4.  Dietary fructans.

Authors:  M B Roberfroid; N M Delzenne
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 11.848

5.  Effect of bifidogenic factors on growth characteristics of bifidobacteria in infant formulas.

Authors:  U K Dubey; V V Mistry
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 6.  Inulin and oligofructose: what are they?

Authors:  K R Niness
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 7.  Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics.

Authors:  G R Gibson; M B Roberfroid
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Telithromycin is active against Mycobacterium avium in mice despite lacking significant activity in standard in vitro and macrophage assays and is associated with low frequency of resistance during treatment.

Authors:  L E Bermudez; C B Inderlied; P Kolonoski; M Wu; P Aralar; L S Young
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Oligofructose modulates lipid metabolism alterations induced by a fat-rich diet in rats.

Authors:  N N Kok; H S Taper; N M Delzenne
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.446

10.  Optimizing conditions for the growth of Lactobacillus casei YIT 9018 in tryptone-yeast extract-glucose medium by using response surface methodology.

Authors:  S Oh; S Rheem; J Sim; S Kim; Y Baek
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  11 in total

1.  Optimization of Culture Conditions for Mass Production of the Probiotics Pseudomonas MCCB 102 and 103 Antagonistic to Pathogenic Vibrios in Aquaculture.

Authors:  R Preetha; K K Vijayan; N S Jayapraksh; S V Alavandi; T C Santiago; I S Bright Singh
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Effect of prebiotic fibre supplementation on hepatic gene expression and serum lipids: a dose-response study in JCR:LA-cp rats.

Authors:  Jill A Parnell; Raylene A Reimer
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 3.  Functional foods and their role in cancer prevention and health promotion: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Mohammad Aghajanpour; Mohamad Reza Nazer; Zia Obeidavi; Mohsen Akbari; Parya Ezati; Nasroallah Moradi Kor
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  No additional cholesterol-lowering effect observed in the combined treatment of red yeast rice and Lactobacillus casei in hyperlipidemic patients: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Chien-Ying Lee; Min-Chien Yu; Wu-Tsun Perng; Chun-Che Lin; Ming-Yung Lee; Ya-Lan Chang; Ya-Yun Lai; Yi-Ching Lee; Yu-Hsiang Kuan; James Cheng-Chung Wei; Hung-Che Shih
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 5.  Cholesterol-lowering effects of probiotics and prebiotics: a review of in vivo and in vitro findings.

Authors:  Lay-Gaik Ooi; Min-Tze Liong
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Evaluation of low-intensity laser radiation on stimulating the cholesterol degrading activity: Part I. Microorganisms isolated from cholesterol-rich materials.

Authors:  Salama A Ouf; Abdulaziz Q Alsarrani; Amira A Al-Adly; Mohamed K Ibrahim
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Use of a D-optimal design with constrains to quantify the effects of the mixture of sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium chloride salts on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J Bautista-Gallego; F N Arroyo-López; A Chiesa; M C Durán-Quintana; A Garrido-Fernández
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Optimization of chromium and tannic acid bioremediation by Aspergillus niveus using Plackett-Burman design and response surface methodology.

Authors:  Prachi Chaudhary; Vinod Chhokar; Pragati Choudhary; Anil Kumar; Vikas Beniwal
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.298

9.  Optimization of submerged fermentation process for improved production of β-carotene by Exiguobacterium acetylicum S01.

Authors:  Sekar Jinendiran; B S Dileep Kumar; Hans-Uwe Dahms; Charli Deepak Arulanandam; Natesan Sivakumar
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-22

10.  How much in vitro cholesterol reducing activity of lactobacilli predicts their in vivo cholesterol function?

Authors:  Golnoush Madani; Maryam Mirlohi; Mahmoud Yahay; Akbar Hassanzadeh
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.