Literature DB >> 15805465

Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress.

Mihoko Kai1, Michael N Boddy, Paul Russell, Teresa S-F Wang.   

Abstract

The replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 preserves genome integrity by stabilizing stalled replication forks. Cds1 targets substrates through its FHA domain. The Cds1 FHA domain interacts with Mus81, a subunit of the Mus81-Eme1 structure-specific endonuclease. We report here that Mus81 and Rhp51 are required for generating deletion mutations in fission yeast replication mutants that experience replication stress. A mutation in the Mus81 FHA-binding motif eliminates its Cds1-binding and Cds1-dependent phosphorylation. Furthermore, this mutation exacerbates the deletion mutator phenotype of a replication mutant, and induces a hyper-recombination phenotype in hydroxyurea-treated cells. In unperturbed cells, Mus81 associates with chromatin throughout S phase. In replication mutants grown at semipermissive temperature, Mus81 undergoes minor Cds1-dependent phosphorylation, remains chromatin-associated, generates deletion mutations, and maintains cell growth. Upon S-phase arrest by acute hydroxyurea treatment, Mus81 is not required for cell viability but is essential for recovery from replication fork collapse. Moreover, Mus81 undergoes extensive Cds1-dependent phosphorylation and dissociates from chromatin in hydroxyurea-arrested cells, thereby preventing it from cleaving stalled replication forks that could lead to fork breakage and chromosomal rearrangement. These results provide novel insights into how Cds1 regulates Mus81 accordingly when cells experience different replication stress to preserve genome integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15805465      PMCID: PMC1080131          DOI: 10.1101/gad.1304305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  62 in total

1.  DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1.

Authors:  Jennifer A Cobb; Lotte Bjergbaek; Kenji Shimada; Christian Frei; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins.

Authors:  Michael Lisby; Jacqueline H Barlow; Rebecca C Burgess; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis.

Authors:  S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cleavage of model replication forks by fission yeast Mus81-Eme1 and budding yeast Mus81-Mms4.

Authors:  Matthew C Whitby; Fekret Osman; Julie Dixon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-12-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Cloning the RAD51 homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  D F Muris; K Vreeken; A M Carr; B C Broughton; A R Lehmann; P H Lohman; A Pastink
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Involvement of mammalian Mus81 in genome integrity and tumor suppression.

Authors:  John Peter McPherson; Bénédicte Lemmers; Richard Chahwan; Ashwin Pamidi; Eva Migon; Elzbieta Matysiak-Zablocki; Mary Ellen Moynahan; Jeroen Essers; Katsuhiro Hanada; Anuradha Poonepalli; Otto Sanchez-Sweatman; Rama Khokha; Roland Kanaar; Maria Jasin; M Prakash Hande; Razqallah Hakem
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Eme1 is involved in DNA damage processing and maintenance of genomic stability in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Jacinth Abraham; Bénédicte Lemmers; M Prakash Hande; Mary Ellen Moynahan; Charly Chahwan; Alberto Ciccia; Jeroen Essers; Katsuhiro Hanada; Richard Chahwan; Aik Kia Khaw; Peter McPherson; Amro Shehabeldin; Rob Laister; Cheryl Arrowsmith; Roland Kanaar; Stephen C West; Maria Jasin; Razqallah Hakem
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 10.  Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks.

Authors:  Peter McGlynn; Robert G Lloyd
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 94.444

View more
  66 in total

1.  A deletion at the mouse Xist gene exposes trans-effects that alter the heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome and the replication time and DNA stability of both X chromosomes.

Authors:  Silvia V Diaz-Perez; David O Ferguson; Chen Wang; Gyorgyi Csankovszki; Chengming Wang; Shih-Chang Tsai; Devkanya Dutta; Vanessa Perez; SunMin Kim; C Daniel Eller; Jennifer Salstrom; Yan Ouyang; Michael A Teitell; Bernhard Kaltenboeck; Andrew Chess; Sui Huang; York Marahrens
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S-phase checkpoint.

Authors:  Constance Alabert; Julien N Bianco; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  A blooming resolvase at chromosomal fragile sites.

Authors:  Achille Pellicioli; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 4.  Replicating damaged DNA in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Nimrat Chatterjee; Wolfram Siede
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  The fission yeast Rad32(Mre11)-Rad50-Nbs1 complex acts both upstream and downstream of checkpoint signaling in the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Nicholas Willis; Nicholas Rhind
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mcm4 C-terminal domain of MCM helicase prevents excessive formation of single-stranded DNA at stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Naoki Nitani; Chie Yadani; Hayato Yabuuchi; Hisao Masukata; Takuro Nakagawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Crystal structure of the Mus81-Eme1 complex.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Chang; Jeong Joo Kim; Jung Min Choi; Jung Hoon Lee; Yunje Cho
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Mus81 is essential for sister chromatid recombination at broken replication forks.

Authors:  Laura Roseaulin; Yoshiki Yamada; Yasuhiro Tsutsui; Paul Russell; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Benoit Arcangioli
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Cds1 controls the release of Cdc14-like phosphatase Flp1 from the nucleolus to drive full activation of the checkpoint response to replication stress in fission yeast.

Authors:  Helena Díaz-Cuervo; Avelino Bueno
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cds1Chk2 regulates homologous recombination at stalled replication forks through the phosphorylation of recombination protein Rad60.

Authors:  Izumi Miyabe; Takashi Morishita; Hideo Shinagawa; Antony M Carr
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.