Literature DB >> 15797777

The perception of motion transparency: a signal-to-noise limit.

Mark Edwards1, John A Greenwood.   

Abstract

A number of studies were conducted to determine how many transparent motion signals observers could simultaneously perceive. It was found that that the limit was two. However, observers required a signal intensity of about 42% in order to perceive a bi-directional transparent stimulus. This signal level was about three times that required to detect a uni-directional motion signal, and higher than was physically possible to achieve in a tri-directional stimulus (in a stimulus in which the different transparent signals are defined only by direction). These results indicate that signal intensity plays an important role in establishing the transparency limit and, as a consequence, implicates the global-motion area (V5/MT) in this process.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15797777     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  The visual processing of motion-defined transparency.

Authors:  William Curran; Paul B Hibbard; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Age-related changes in fine motion direction discriminations.

Authors:  Nadejda Bocheva; Donka Angelova; Miroslava Stefanova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  On the number of perceivable blur levels in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Christopher Patrick Taylor; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Relating spatial and temporal orientation pooling to population decoding solutions in human vision.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Timothy Ledgeway; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A common framework for the analysis of complex motion? Standstill and capture illusions.

Authors:  Max R Dürsteler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Population receptive field estimates for motion-defined stimuli.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; John A Greenwood; Nonie J Finlayson; D Samuel Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Motion noise changes directional interaction between transparently moving stimuli from repulsion to attraction.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gaudio; Xin Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Weaker signals induce more precise temporal-integration.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Tsushima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.