Literature DB >> 17284410

The visual processing of motion-defined transparency.

William Curran1, Paul B Hibbard, Alan Johnston.   

Abstract

Our understanding of how the visual system processes motion transparency, the phenomenon by which multiple directions of motion are perceived to coexist in the same spatial region, has grown considerably in the past decade. There is compelling evidence that the process is driven by global-motion mechanisms. Consequently, although transparently moving surfaces are readily segmented over an extended space, the visual system cannot separate two motion signals that coexist in the same local region. A related issue is whether the visual system can detect transparently moving surfaces simultaneously or whether the component signals encounter a serial 'bottleneck' during their processing. Our initial results show that, at sufficiently short stimulus durations, observers cannot accurately detect two superimposed directions; yet they have no difficulty in detecting one pattern direction in noise, supporting the serial-bottleneck scenario. However, in a second experiment, the difference in performance between the two tasks disappears when the component patterns are segregated. This discrepancy between the processing of transparent and non-overlapping patterns may be a consequence of suppressed activity of global-motion mechanisms when the transparent surfaces are presented in the same depth plane. To test this explanation, we repeated our initial experiment while separating the motion components in depth. The marked improvement in performance leads us to conclude that transparent motion signals are represented simultaneously.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17284410      PMCID: PMC2124472          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  36 in total

1.  Motion integration during motion aftereffects.

Authors:  Zoltán Vidnyánszky; Erik Blaser; Thomas V. Papathomas
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The perception of motion transparency: a signal-to-noise limit.

Authors:  Mark Edwards; John A Greenwood
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli.

Authors:  C J Duffy; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Residual motion perception in a "motion-blind" patient, assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli.

Authors:  C L Baker; R F Hess; J Zihl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Segregation of spatially superimposed optic flow components.

Authors:  B De Bruyn; G A Orban
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A transparent motion aftereffect contingent on binocular disparity.

Authors:  F A Verstraten; R Verlinde; R E Fredericksen; W A van de Grind
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics.

Authors:  N Qian; R A Andersen; E H Adelson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  T D Albright
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J A Movshon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Thresholds for movement direction: two directions are less detectable than one.

Authors:  G Mather; B Moulden
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1983-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.