Literature DB >> 23708801

Age-related changes in fine motion direction discriminations.

Nadejda Bocheva1, Donka Angelova, Miroslava Stefanova.   

Abstract

The present study used an equivalent noise method to characterize the sources of reduced performance in fine discrimination of motion with age. We varied the density of the displays, the speed and speed variability and the temporal correlation of dots' motion in successive frames to assess their effect on the sensitivity to motion direction. The results showed that, in all experimental conditions, the older observers had higher levels of internal noise. Both age groups used the stimulus information less efficiently at slow speed and most efficiently when the moving elements were uncorrelated across frames. The older observers were less efficient than the younger observers in all conditions except at high speed where the efficiency of the two age groups was the same. We fitted two biologically plausible models to the experimental data: a modified version of the local-to-global direction encoding model (Dakin et al. in Vis Res 45:3027-3049, 2005) and a model for pooling of motion information in medial temporal area (MT) where the neuronal responses were correlated (Huang and Lisberger in J Neurophysiol 101:3012-3030, 2009). The modeling results indicate that the correlation in neuronal responses is essential to characterize the influence of speed and speed variability on the sensitivity to direction information. For the younger observers, a single set of parameters can account for the effect of noise and the spatio-temporal parameters of the stimuli, while, for the older observers, a change in the correlation of neuronal activity and the directional tuning bandwidth with the levels of external noise is needed. The findings are discussed with respect to optimal use of the dynamic information to overcome the negative effect of aging.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23708801     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3559-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  69 in total

1.  The perception of motion transparency: a signal-to-noise limit.

Authors:  Mark Edwards; John A Greenwood
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effects of aging on orientation discrimination.

Authors:  Lisa R Betts; Allison B Sekuler; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Aging affects the direction selectivity of MT cells in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Zhen Liang; Yun Yang; Guangxing Li; Jie Zhang; Yongchang Wang; Yifeng Zhou; Audie G Leventhal
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Differential aging of motion processing mechanisms: evidence against general perceptual decline.

Authors:  Jutta Billino; Frank Bremmer; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Correspondence noise and signal pooling in the detection of coherent visual motion.

Authors:  H Barlow; S P Tripathy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations.

Authors:  Marlene R Cohen; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Direction- and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (MT).

Authors:  J Allman; F Miezin; E McGuinness
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Neural computations governing spatiotemporal pooling of visual motion signals in humans.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Timothy Ledgeway; Francesca Rocchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Estimates of the contribution of single neurons to perception depend on timescale and noise correlation.

Authors:  Marlene R Cohen; William T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Noise correlations in cortical area MT and their potential impact on trial-by-trial variation in the direction and speed of smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  5 in total

1.  Distinct Aging Effects on Motion Repulsion and Surround Suppression in Humans.

Authors:  Hu Deng; Weiying Chen; Shenbing Kuang; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.750

2.  Phase integration bias in a motion grouping task.

Authors:  Jessica N Cali; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  How the External Visual Noise Affects Motion Direction Discrimination in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Nadejda Bocheva; Ivan Hristov; Simeon Stefanov; Tsvetalin Totev; Svetla Nikolaeva Staykova; Milena Slavcheva Mihaylova
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18

4.  Averaging, not internal noise, limits the development of coherent motion processing.

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Steven C Dakin; Marc S Tibber; Elizabeth Pellicano
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 6.464

5.  Age-Related Changes in Global Motion Coherence: Conflicting Haemodynamic and Perceptual Responses.

Authors:  Laura McKernan Ward; Gordon Morison; Anita Jane Simmers; Uma Shahani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.