Literature DB >> 16586132

Outcome following deep wound contamination in cemented arthroplasty.

A M Byrne1, S Morris, T McCarthy, W Quinlan, J M O'byrne.   

Abstract

Infection remains a devastating complication of joint replacement surgery causing a significant burden to both patient and surgeon. However, despite exhaustive prophylactic measures, intraoperative contamination still occurs during cemented arthroplasty with current infection rates of 1-2%. A study was undertaken to determine the incidence of perioperative contamination in cemented arthroplasty patients, to identify contaminating organisms, to identify contaminated regions within the operative wound, to identify factors associated with increased contamination, and finally to assess the medium-term clinical outcome in patients with confirmed intraoperative wound contamination. Eighty consecutive patients undergoing hip and knee cemented arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled over a 6-month period. All scrubbed personnel wore total body exhaust isolation suits and procedures were carried out in ultra-clean air theatres. Of 441 samples, contamination was identified at 21 sites (4.8%) representing a cohort of 18 patients (22.5%). Longer duration of surgery predisposed to higher contamination rates while lower contamination rates were significantly related to fewer gowned personnel within the ultra-clean system, and fewer total personnel in theatre during the procedure. None of the patients developed clinical evidence of deep prosthetic infection at follow-up. We noted a high incidence of intraoperative contamination despite standard prophylaxis. However, this was not reflected by a similar rate of postoperative infection. This may be due to a small bacterial inoculum in each case or may be due to the therapeutic effect of perioperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16586132      PMCID: PMC2267550          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0121-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Intraoperative bacterial contamination in operations for joint replacement.

Authors:  A Gutow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-07

2.  The value of hip aspiration versus tissue biopsy in diagnosing infection before exchange hip arthroplasty surgery.

Authors:  James Leigh Williams; Paul Norman; Ian Stockley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Deep wound sepsis following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R H Fitzgerald; D R Nolan; D M Ilstrup; R E Van Scoy; J A Washington; M B Coventry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The prevention of wound contamination by skin organisms by the pre-operative application of an iodophor impregnated plastic adhesive drape.

Authors:  J A Fairclough; D Johnson; I Mackie
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Postoperative infection in total prosthetic replacement arthroplasty of the hip-joint. With special reference to the bacterial content of the air of the operating room.

Authors:  J Charnley; N Eftekhar
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Perioperative contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Patrick G M Maathuis; Daniëlle Neut; Henk J Busscher; Henny C van der Mei; Jim R van Horn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Microbiological culture results for the femoral head. Are they important to the donor?

Authors:  L A James; T Ibrahim; C N Esler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

8.  Total hip replacement in a laminar flow environment with special reference to deep infections.

Authors:  G B Ha'eri; A M Wiley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Effect of autologous salvaged blood on postoperative natural killer cell precursor frequency.

Authors:  Ahmad Gharehbaghian; Kharaja M G Haque; Carol Truman; Rachel Evans; Ruth Morse; John Newman; Gordon Bannister; Chris Rogers; Benjamin A Bradley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Bacteria isolated from deep joint sepsis after operation for total hip or knee replacement and the sources of the infections with Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  O M Lidwell; E J Lowbury; W Whyte; R Blowers; S J Stanley; D Lowe
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  11 in total

1.  Elective hip and knee arthroplasty and the effect of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis on wound healing.

Authors:  Katia Sindali; Barry Rose; Hassan Soueid; Parminder Jeer; Deepak Saran; Raj Shrivastava
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-04-17

2.  Periprosthetic joint infections at a teaching hospital in 1990-2007.

Authors:  Alexandre Renaud; Martin Lavigne; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Emperor's new clothes: Is particle disease really infected particle disease?

Authors:  Marcin K Wasko; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Advance pre-operative chlorhexidine reduces the incidence of surgical site infections in knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Jacqueline A Daley; Ronald E Delanois; Qais Naziri; Aaron J Johnson; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  What is the significance of a positive Propionibacterium acnes culture around a joint replacement?

Authors:  A Dramis; E Aldlyami; R J Grimer; D J Dunlop; N O'Connell; T Elliott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  An easy, low-cost method for achieving adequate facial hair coverage for surgeons.

Authors:  Saqib Masud; John Glynne Andrew
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.951

7.  Bacterial contamination of the wound during primary total hip and knee replacement. Median 13 years of follow-up of 90 replacements.

Authors:  Eythor Örn Jonsson; Hera Johannesdottir; Otto Robertsson; Brynjolfur Mogensen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  High incidence of periprosthetic joint infection with propionibacterium acnes after the use of a stemless shoulder prosthesis with metaphyseal screw fixation - a retrospective cohort study of 241 patients.

Authors:  Lisa Johansson; Nils P Hailer; Hans Rahme
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Reduction in Operating Room Airborne Particle Burden and Time-Dependent Contamination of Sterile Instrument Trays With the Use of a Novel Air Filtration System.

Authors:  Fady Y Hijji; Andrew D Schneider; Jeffrey T Reeves; Michael L Wilson; Logan Nye; Joseph G Lyons; Michael J Prayson; Louis J Rubino
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-14

10.  Does intraoperative contamination during primary knee arthroplasty affect patient-reported outcomes for patients who are uninfected 1 year after surgery? A prospective cohort study of 714 patients.

Authors:  Tobias Justesen; Jakob B Olsen; Anne B Hesselvig; Anne Mørup-Petersen; Anders Odgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.