Literature DB >> 15793334

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: 30-day mortality trends and risk factors.

S E J Janes1, C S G Price, S Khan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: 30-day Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) mortality of 8% (1992). Recent concerns suggest that mortality may have increased, prompting a comparison of current practice with that reported earlier.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data regarding PEG insertion with relation to case mix, complications, 30-day mortality and associated risk factors, in 2002, in a British University Hospital was compared with that in 1992. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors independently predictive of 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: In 2002, 112 patients (70% males, mean age 67.5 years; 1992: 63.6 years) underwent PEG. The 30-day mortality increased significantly from 8% (1992) to 22% (2002), P= 0.03. During this time, PEG insertion rate increased ten-fold, however, procedure-related mortality decreased from 2% to nil. In terms of percentage, the indications for PEG in 1992 and 2002 respectively were: cerebrovascular disease (33/25), head and neck tumours (16/24), motor neuron disease (27/11, P= 0.01). The proportion of PEGs for non-evidence-based indications increased from 16% in 1992 to 31% in 2002, P= 0.048. The number of PEGs placed radiologically increased (0/17, P= 0.02). Radiological patients received less antibiotic prophylaxis (P< 0.001) and had more PEG site infections than standard placement, P= 0.04. Multivariate analysis identified nil by mouth > or = 7 days or 11.4 (CI 3.2-41.7), albumin< or = 30 g/L or 12 (2.2-66.7) and > 1 cardiac factor or 5.1 (1.02-25.6) as independent predictors of 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The ten-fold rise in the PEG insertion rate has been accompanied by a three-fold rise in 30-day mortality. This may reflect a lowered threshold of PEG insertion. The risk factors identified may help decision-making in cases where the risk-benefit relationship is not clear-cut.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15793334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Postgrad Med        ISSN: 0022-3859            Impact factor:   1.476


  19 in total

Review 1.  How should this patient with repeated aspiration pneumonia be managed and treated?-a proposal of the Percutaneous ENdoscopIc Gastrostomy and Tracheostomy (PENlIGhT) procedure.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Jason Akulian; Yucai Hong; Ning Liu; Yuhao Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Practice Patterns of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Acute Stroke: Are the Guidelines Achievable?

Authors:  Janina Wilmskoetter; Annie N Simpson; Kit N Simpson; Heather S Bonilha
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy After Cardiac Surgery: A Temporary Measure in a High-Risk Cohort.

Authors:  Jared P Beller; Daniel Phadke; Elizabeth D Krebs; William Z Chancellor; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Robert G Sawyer; Gorav Ailawadi; Leora T Yarboro
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) site infections: a clinical and microbiological study from university teaching hospital, India.

Authors:  Sushma Krishna; Sanjeev Singh; Kavitha R Dinesh; Remya Kp; Ismail Siyad; Shamsul Karim
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2014-12-10

5.  Regional Comparison of Enteral Nutrition-Related Admission Policies in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Authors:  Marissa Burgermaster; Eoin Slattery; Nafeesa Islam; Paul R Ippolito; David S Seres
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.080

6.  Hospital and long-term outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Brian M Smith; Paul Perring; Milo Engoren; Joseph J Sferra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A better method for preventing infection of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Chao-Hung Kuo; Huang-Ming Hu; Pei-Yun Tsai; Chen-Ju Liu; Fang-Jung Yu; Ko Chang; Yong-Sang Pan; Angela Chen; Chang-Ming Jan; Wen-Ming Wang; Deng-Chyang Wu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Predictive factors for early mortality after percutaneous endoscopic and radiologically-inserted gastrostomy.

Authors:  Faidon-Marios Laskaratos; Martin Walker; Mary Walker; Janitha Gowribalan; Despoina Gkotsi; Victoria Wojciechowska; Ajay Arora; Anthony Jenkins
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Basic geriatric assessment does not predict in-hospital mortality after PEG placement.

Authors:  Christine Smoliner; Dorothee Volkert; Anke Wittrich; Cornel C Sieber; Rainer Wirth
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Special considerations for endoscopists on PEG indications in older patients.

Authors:  Fabrizio Cardin
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.