Literature DB >> 27475521

Practice Patterns of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Acute Stroke: Are the Guidelines Achievable?

Janina Wilmskoetter1, Annie N Simpson2, Kit N Simpson3, Heather S Bonilha4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to evaluate trends in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement rate and timing in acute stroke patients. We hypothesized that noncompliance with clinical practice guidelines for timing of tube placement and an increase in placement occurred because of a decrease in length of hospital stay.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of archival hospital billing data from the Florida state inpatient healthcare cost and utilization project database from 2001 to 2012 for patients with a primary diagnosis of stroke. Outcome measures were timing of PEG tube placements by year (2006-2012), rate of placements by year (2001-2012), and length of hospital stay. Univariate analyses and simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: The timing of gastrostomy tube placement remained stable with a median of 7 days post admission from 2006 through 2012. The proportion of tubes that were placed at or after 14 days and thereby met the guideline recommendations varied from 14.09% in 2006 to 13.41% in 2012. The rate of tube placement in stroke patients during the acute hospital stay decreased significantly by 25% from 6.94% in 2001 to 5.22% in 2012 (P < .0001). The length of hospital stay for all stroke patients decreased over the study period (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of PEG tube placements happen earlier than clinical practice guidelines recommend. Over the study period, the rate of tubes placed in stroke patients decreased during the acute hospital stay despite an overall reduced length of stay.
Copyright © 2016 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; clinical practice pattern; gastrostomy; guideline adherence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27475521      PMCID: PMC5159285          DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  23 in total

1.  Trends in stroke rates, risk, and outcomes in the United States, 1988 to 2008.

Authors:  Margaret C Fang; Marcelo Coca Perraillon; Kaushik Ghosh; David M Cutler; Allison B Rosen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Bing Li; Chantal M Couris; Kiyohide Fushimi; Patrick Graham; Phil Hider; Jean-Marie Januel; Vijaya Sundararajan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Gastrostomy Tube Placement After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the United States.

Authors:  Roland Faigle; Mona N Bahouth; Victor C Urrutia; Rebecca F Gottesman
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  FOOD: a multicentre randomised trial evaluating feeding policies in patients admitted to hospital with a recent stroke.

Authors:  M Dennis; S Lewis; G Cranswick; J Forbes
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Trends in risk factors, stroke subtypes and outcome. Nineteen-year data from the Sagrat Cor Hospital of Barcelona stroke registry.

Authors:  Adrià Arboix; Victòria Cendrós; Marta Besa; Luís García-Eroles; Montserrat Oliveres; Cecília Targa; Miquel Balcells; Emili Comes; Joan Massons
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  New model for predicting surgical feeding tube placement in patients with an acute stroke event.

Authors:  Perry H Dubin; Amelia K Boehme; James E Siegler; Amir Shaban; Jenifer Juengling; Karen C Albright; Sheryl Martin-Schild
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for enteral nutrition in patients with stroke.

Authors:  L Ha; T Hauge
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Enterostomy feeding for patients with stroke and bulbar palsy.

Authors:  J Powell-Tuck; N van Someren
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Guideline clinical nutrition in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Rainer Wirth; Christine Smoliner; Martin Jäger; Tobias Warnecke; Andreas H Leischker; Rainer Dziewas
Journal:  Exp Transl Stroke Med       Date:  2013-12-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Oral Intake Improvement and Feeding Tube Dependency in Patients with Poststroke Dysphagia.

Authors:  Janina Wilmskoetter; Leonardo Bonilha; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Jordan J Elm; Janet Horn; Heather S Bonilha
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Physician opinions on decision making for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube placement.

Authors:  Theresa A Fessler; Timothy B Short; Kate F Willcutts; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Outcomes among patients with direct enteral vs nasogastric tube placement after acute stroke.

Authors:  Raed A Joundi; Gustavo Saposnik; Rosemary Martino; Jiming Fang; Joan Porter; Moira K Kapral
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Cortical and Subcortical Control of Swallowing-Can We Use Information From Lesion Locations to Improve Diagnosis and Treatment for Patients With Stroke?

Authors:  Janina Wilmskoetter; Stephanie K Daniels; Arthur J Miller
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Minority race and male sex as risk factors for non-beneficial gastrostomy tube placements after stroke.

Authors:  Roland Faigle; Joseph A Carrese; Lisa A Cooper; Victor C Urrutia; Rebecca F Gottesman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mapping acute lesion locations to physiological swallow impairments after stroke.

Authors:  Janina Wilmskoetter; Leonardo Bonilha; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Jordan J Elm; Janet Horn; Heather S Bonilha
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Speech-language pathology approaches to neurorehabilitation in acute care during COVID-19: Capitalizing on neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Nicole Langton-Frost; Martin B Brodsky
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.218

8.  Age-Specific and Sex-Specific Trends in Life-Sustaining Care After Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Raed A Joundi; Eric E Smith; Amy Y X Yu; Mohammed Rashid; Jiming Fang; Moira K Kapral
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.