Literature DB >> 15791373

Minilaparoscopic (needlescopic) cholecystectomy: a study of 1,011 cases.

P-C Lee1, I-R Lai, S-C Yu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and feasibility of minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy has not been documented with a large patient sample. This study reports the results of 1,011 minilaparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in a single institution.
METHODS: From November 1997 to May 2002, 1,023 consecutive patients underwent minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy at National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Patients with clinical evidence of common bile duct stones (1 patient) and combined surgery for other purposes (11 patients) were excluded. The operative indication, total operative time, conversion rate, hospital stay, morbidity and mortality of 1,011 patients were reviewed and statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 1,009 of 1,011 patients (375 males and 636 female; mean age, 54.8 years; range 13-92 years). The total operative time was 68.8 +/- 31.9 min. The total hospital stay was 2.5 +/- 2 days. One patient (0.10%) underwent conversion to open cholecystectomy because of common hepatic duct laceration. One patient (0.10%) underwent conversion to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy for control of cystic artery bleeding. Ten patients (0.99%) experienced major complications including intraabdominal abscess (1 patient), bile leakage (5 patients), major bile duct injury (2 patients), bowel injury (1 patient), and postoperative hemorrhage (1 patient). Eleven patients (1.09%) had minor complications including wound infection, incisional herniation, postoperative ileus, and acute urine retention. One patient (0.10%) with bleeding tendency succumbed to postoperative hemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS: Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy is a technically demanding approach. Our results indicate that this procedure could be performed successfully and safely by experienced surgical teams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15791373     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8247-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Cosmetic minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P L Leggett; C D Bissell; R Churchman-Winn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative cholangiography in the prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  David R Flum; Christopher Flowers; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: trans-Canada experience with 2201 cases.

Authors:  D E Litwin; M J Girotti; E C Poulin; J Mamazza; A G Nagy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Microlaparoscopy: a preliminary report.

Authors:  F Risquez; G Pennehouat; R Fernandez; E Confino; O Rodriguez
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the European experience.

Authors:  J Perissat
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Combined use of mini-laparoscope and conventional laparoscope in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preservation of minimal invasiveness.

Authors:  S C Yu; R H Yuan; S C Chen; W J Lee
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.878

7.  Needlescopic or minisite cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S S Ngoi; P Goh; K Kok; C K Kum; W K Cheah
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  U.S. experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T R Gadacz
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients.

Authors:  G M Larson; G C Vitale; J Casey; J S Evans; G Gilliam; L Heuser; G McGee; M Rao; M J Scherm; C R Voyles
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Early minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Chi-Hsun Hsieh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature.

Authors:  Martin Gaillard; Hadrien Tranchart; Panagiotis Lainas; Ibrahim Dagher
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-27

2.  [Minilaparoscopic surgery : alternative or supplement to single-port surgery?].

Authors:  L Brinkmann; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of methodology and outcomes.

Authors:  Masato Yamazaki; Hideki Yasuda; Keiji Koda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Twenty years of mini-laparoscopy in Brazil: What we have learned so far.

Authors:  Diego Laurentino Lima; Gustavo Lopes Carvalho; Raquel Nogueira Cordeiro
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Reevaluation of needlescopic surgery.

Authors:  Nobumi Tagaya; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Renaissance of Minilaparoscopy in the NOTES and single port era.

Authors:  Gustavo L Carvalho; Marcelo P Loureiro; Eduardo A Bonin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Is mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy any better than the gold standard?: A comparative study.

Authors:  Haris R Shaikh; Asad Abbas; Salik Aleem; Miqdad R Lakhani
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Systematic review of cystic duct closure techniques in relation to prevention of bile duct leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Aafke H van Dijk; Stijn van Roessel; Philip R de Reuver; Djamila Boerma; Marja A Boermeester; Sandra C Donkervoort
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.