Literature DB >> 26523212

New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature.

Martin Gaillard1, Hadrien Tranchart1, Panagiotis Lainas1, Ibrahim Dagher1.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed abdominal intervention in Western countries. In an attempt to reduce the invasiveness of the procedure, surgeons have developed single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). The aim of this review was to determine the role of these new minimally invasive approaches for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of gallstone related disease. Current literature remains insufficient for the correct assessment of emerging techniques for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. None of these procedures has demonstrated clear benefits over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SILC cannot be currently recommended as it can be associated with an increased risk of bile duct injury and incisional hernia incidence. NOTES cholecystectomy is still experimental, although hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy is gaining popularity in clinical practice. As it is standardized and almost identical to the standard laparoscopic technique, MLC could lead to limited benefits without exposing patients to increased postoperative complications, being therefore adoptable for routine elective cholecystectomy. Technical challenges of SILC and NOTES cholecystectomy could be addressed with the evolution of new surgical tools that need to catch up with the innovative minds of surgeons. Regardless the place of these approaches in the future, robotization may be necessary to impose them as standard treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystectomy; Laparoscopy; Minilaparoscopy; Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; Review; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 26523212      PMCID: PMC4621474          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i10.243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


  51 in total

1.  Multimedia article. Per-oral dual scope NOTES cholecystectomy in porcine model (with video).

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Asakuma; Silvana Perretta; Pierre Allemann; Ronan Cahill; Bernard Dallemagne; Nobuhiko Tanigawa; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): dissection for the critical view of safety during transcolonic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Edward D Auyang; Eric S Hungness; Khashayar Vaziri; John A Martin; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Jai Deep Thakur; Mahak Garg; Geetha R Menon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Trastulli; R Cirocchi; J Desiderio; S Guarino; A Santoro; A Parisi; G Noya; C Boselli
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Single-incision versus standard multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies.

Authors:  Nicolò Tamini; Matteo Rota; Elisa Bolzonaro; Luca Nespoli; Angelo Nespoli; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Luca Gianotti
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 6.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; S Thrumurthy; L Muirhead; J Kinross; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Saad; V Strassel; S Sauerland
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Disinfection of the Access Orifice in NOTES: Evaluation of the Evidence Base.

Authors:  Mikael H Sodergren; Philip Pucher; James Clark; David R C James; Jenny Sockett; Nagy Matar; Julian Teare; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2011-07-12

9.  Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liangyuan Geng; Changhua Sun; Jianfeng Bai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Dirk Rolf Bulian; Jürgen Knuth; Nicola Cerasani; Axel Sauerwald; Rolf Lefering; Markus Maria Heiss
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  10 in total

1.  Does the number of incisions in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery matter?

Authors:  Henrik Jessen Hansen; Gonzalo Varela; René Horsleben Petersen; William S Walker
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with two mini cosmetic incisions.

Authors:  Alireza Tavassoli; Sajad Noorshafiee
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

3.  A retrospective analysis of bile duct injuries treated in a tertiary center: the utility of a universal classification-the ATOM classification.

Authors:  C Popa; D Schlanger; F Zaharie; F Graur; E Moiș; A Ciocan; N Al Hajjar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  An innovative procedure of laparoscope combined with endoscopy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor resection and cholecystectomy: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Y E Yan; Feng Li; Yong-Hao Gai; Qing-Wei Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  The Safety and Efficacy of Clipless versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - our Experience in an Indian Rural Center.

Authors:  Rikki Singal; Abhishek Sharma; Muzzafar Zaman
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2018-03

6.  Risk Factors for Open Conversion in Minimally Invasive Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Antonio Gangemi; Richard Danilkowicz; Francesco Bianco; Mario Masrur; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 7.  Minilaparoscopic versus single incision cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Xuan Tan; Guobin Wang; Yong Tang; Jie Bai; Kaixiong Tao; Lin Ye
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Short and Long-Term Outcomes After Surgical Procedures Lasting for More Than Six Hours.

Authors:  Natalia Cornellà; Joan Sancho; Antonio Sitges-Serra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Andrea T Fisher; Kovi E Bessoff; Rida I Khan; Gavin C Touponse; Maggie M K Yu; Advait A Patil; Jeff Choi; Christopher D Stave; Joseph D Forrester
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-18

10.  Which Cholecystectomy do Medical Students Prefer?

Authors:  Gustavo L Carvalho; Diego Laurentino Lima; Phillip P Shadduck; Gustavo Henrique Belarmino de Góes; Gustavo Barros Alves de Carvalho; Raquel Nogueira Cordeiro; Eduarda Migueis Quintas Calheiros; Dalmir Cavalcanti Dos Santos
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.