Literature DB >> 15787853

Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes.

Greg Hajcak1, Clay B Holroyd, Jason S Moser, Robert F Simons.   

Abstract

The error-related negativity (ERN) is an event-related brain potential observed when subjects receive feedback indicating errors or monetary losses. Evidence suggests that the ERN is larger for unexpected negative feedback. The P300 has also been shown to be enhanced for unexpected feedback, but does not appear to be sensitive to feedback valence. The present study evaluated the role of expectations on the ERN and P300 in two experiments that manipulated the probability of negative feedback (25%, 50%, or 75%) on a trial-by-trial basis in experiment 1, and by varying the frequency of positive and negative feedback across blocks of trials in experiment 2. In both experiments, P300 amplitude was larger for unexpected feedback; however, the ERN was equally large for expected and unexpected negative feedback. These results are discussed in terms of the potential role of expectations in processing errors and negative feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15787853     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00278.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  149 in total

1.  Effects of social context and predictive relevance on action outcome monitoring.

Authors:  Leonie Koban; Gilles Pourtois; Benoit Bediou; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Perceptual Salience and Reward Both Influence Feedback-Related Neural Activity Arising from Choice.

Authors:  Bin Lou; Wha-Yin Hsu; Paul Sajda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Compensatory processing during rule-based category learning in older adults.

Authors:  Krishna L Bharani; Ken A Paller; Paul J Reber; Sandra Weintraub; Jorge Yanar; Robert G Morrison
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  Reinforcement learning signals predict future decisions.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen; Christian E Elger; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Reward processing deficits and impulsivity in high-risk offspring of alcoholics: A study of event-related potentials during a monetary gambling task.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Ashwini K Pandey; David B Chorlian; Niklas Manz; Arthur T Stimus; Lance O Bauer; Victor M Hesselbrock; Marc A Schuckit; Samuel Kuperman; John Kramer; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Corticolimbic mechanisms in the control of trial and error learning.

Authors:  Phan Luu; Matthew Shane; Nikki L Pratt; Don M Tucker
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Michael J Frank; Theresa J Klein; John J B Allen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.