Literature DB >> 26422522

Compensatory processing during rule-based category learning in older adults.

Krishna L Bharani1, Ken A Paller2, Paul J Reber2, Sandra Weintraub3, Jorge Yanar4, Robert G Morrison5.   

Abstract

Healthy older adults typically perform worse than younger adults at rule-based category learning, but better than patients with Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease. To further investigate aging's effect on rule-based category learning, we monitored event-related potentials (ERPs) while younger and neuropsychologically typical older adults performed a visual category-learning task with a rule-based category structure and trial-by-trial feedback. Using these procedures, we previously identified ERPs sensitive to categorization strategy and accuracy in young participants. In addition, previous studies have demonstrated the importance of neural processing in the prefrontal cortex and the medial temporal lobe for this task. In this study, older adults showed lower accuracy and longer response times than younger adults, but there were two distinct subgroups of older adults. One subgroup showed near-chance performance throughout the procedure, never categorizing accurately. The other subgroup reached asymptotic accuracy that was equivalent to that in younger adults, although they categorized more slowly. These two subgroups were further distinguished via ERPs. Consistent with the compensation theory of cognitive aging, older adults who successfully learned showed larger frontal ERPs when compared with younger adults. Recruitment of prefrontal resources may have improved performance while slowing response times. Additionally, correlations of feedback-locked P300 amplitudes with category-learning accuracy differentiated successful younger and older adults. Overall, the results suggest that the ability to adapt one's behavior in response to feedback during learning varies across older individuals, and that the failure of some to adapt their behavior may reflect inadequate engagement of prefrontal cortex.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Category learning; aging; event-related potentials; rule-based learning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26422522      PMCID: PMC4828326          DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1091438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn        ISSN: 1382-5585


  64 in total

1.  Accounting for age differences on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: decreased working memory, not inflexibility.

Authors:  M Hartman; E Bolton; S E Fehnel
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2001-09

2.  Deferred feedback sharply dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Jessica L Roeder; Barbara A Church; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Relational integration, inhibition, and analogical reasoning in older adults.

Authors:  Indre V Viskontas; Robert G Morrison; Keith J Holyoak; John E Hummel; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-12

4.  Diagnostic value of event-related evoked potentials N200 and P300 subcomponents in early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Karim Bennys; Florence Portet; Jacques Touchon; Gérard Rondouin
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.177

5.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Wesley Clapp; Jon Kelley; Kevin McEvoy; Robert T Knight; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  P J Reber; L R Squire
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Dissociable properties of memory systems: differences in the flexibility of declarative and nondeclarative knowledge.

Authors:  P J Reber; B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  The Alzheimer's Disease Centers' Uniform Data Set (UDS): the neuropsychologic test battery.

Authors:  Sandra Weintraub; David Salmon; Nathaniel Mercaldo; Steven Ferris; Neill R Graff-Radford; Helena Chui; Jeffrey Cummings; Charles DeCarli; Norman L Foster; Douglas Galasko; Elaine Peskind; Woodrow Dietrich; Duane L Beekly; Walter A Kukull; John C Morris
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.703

View more
  1 in total

1.  Category learning can alter perception and its neural correlates.

Authors:  Fernanda Pérez-Gay Juárez; Tomy Sicotte; Christian Thériault; Stevan Harnad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.