Literature DB >> 26007689

Psychological impact of breast cancer screening in Japan.

Atsuko Kitano1,2,3, Hideko Yamauchi4, Takashi Hosaka5, Hiroshi Yagata4, Keiko Hosokawa6, Sachiko Ohde7, Seigo Nakamura8, Masafumi Takimoto9, Hiroko Tsunoda10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychological impact of breast cancer screening by use of mammography and/or ultrasound, and to reveal factors related to psychological distress.
METHODS: Three hundred and twenty women were recalled to our hospital because of suspicious malignant findings from breast cancer screening between March and November 2012. They were asked to complete three questionnaires: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for anxiety and depression, the Brief Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced scale (Brief COPE) for coping styles, and an original questionnaire for personal information.
RESULTS: Complete data were available for 312 of 320 women (97.5 %). The median age was 45 years (range 23-73). The HADS revealed borderline or clinically significant anxiety for 70 % of the women. Family history of breast cancer, area of residence, number of times screened, number of recalls, and the period before the first visit were significantly related to psychological distress (p < 0.05). Brief COPE scores showed that self-blame, behavioral disengagement, self-distraction, use of emotional support, venting, denial, and less acceptance were related to increased anxiety.
CONCLUSION: Seventy percent of women who were recalled after breast cancer screening experienced psychological distress. Thus, negative psychological impact should be regarded as an adverse effect of breast cancer screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast screening; Psychological distress; Psychological impact

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26007689     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-015-0845-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  32 in total

1.  Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Honor J Passow
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Lampic; E Thurfjell; J Bergh; P O Sjödén
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; M B Barton; V M Moceri; S Polk; P J Arena; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Matching health messages to monitor-blunter coping styles to motivate screening mammography.

Authors:  Pamela Williams-Piehota; Judith Pizarro; Tamera R Schneider; Linda Mowad; Peter Salovey
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  F J Gilbert; C M Cordiner; I R Affleck; D B Hood; D Mathieson; L G Walker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment.

Authors:  J Brett; J Austoker; G Ong
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1998-12

7.  Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial.

Authors:  Mary B Barton; Debra S Morley; Sara Moore; Jennifer D Allen; Ken P Kleinman; Karen M Emmons; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04
View more
  4 in total

1.  The relationship between coping strategies, quality of life, and mood in patients with incurable cancer.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Areej El-Jawahri; Joel N Fishbein; Justin Eusebio; Jamie M Stagl; Emily R Gallagher; Elyse R Park; Vicki A Jackson; William F Pirl; Joseph A Greer; Jennifer S Temel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Coping and Prognostic Awareness in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Joseph A Greer; Areej El-Jawahri; Samantha M Moran; Lara Traeger; Jamie M Jacobs; Juliet C Jacobsen; Emily R Gallagher; Elyse R Park; David P Ryan; Vicki A Jackson; William F Pirl; Jennifer S Temel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Experiences of Women Who Refuse Recall for Further Investigation of Abnormal Screening Mammography: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Wei-Ying Sung; Hui-Chuan Yang; I-Chen Liao; Yu-Ting Su; Fu-Husan Chen; Shu-Ling Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The prevalence of perceived stigma and self-blame and their associations with depression, emotional well-being and social well-being among advanced cancer patients: evidence from the APPROACH cross-sectional study in Vietnam.

Authors:  Nguyen Tuong Pham; Jia Jia Lee; Nhu Hiep Pham; Thi Do Quyen Phan; Khoa Tran; Hoai Bao Dang; Irene Teo; Chetna Malhotra; Eric A Finkelstein; Semra Ozdemir
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.234

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.