Literature DB >> 30625008

Screening Mammography Among Older Women: A Review of United States Guidelines and Potential Harms.

Deborah S Mack1,2, Kate L Lapane2.   

Abstract

In the United States, older women (aged ≥65 years) continue to receive routine screening mammography surveillance, despite limited evidence supporting the benefits to this subpopulation. This article reviews screening mammography guidelines and the potential harms of such screening for older women in the United States. Published guidelines and recommendations on screening mammography for older women from professional medical societies and organizations in the United States were reviewed from the mid-20th century to present. Observational data were then synthesized to present the documented harms from screening mammography among older women. In 1976, the American Cancer Society recommended to screen all women aged ≥40 years with no upper age limit. With time, other major U.S. medical societies adopted their own screening guidelines without a consensus on age of screening cessation. A population-wide screening effort has largely continued without an upper age limit and with it, a growing body of literature on the harms of screening older women. Reported harms from screening mammography procedures have included physical pain, psychological distress, excessive use of health services from overdiagnoses/false positives, and undue financial expenses. These costs are particularly pronounced among special populations with limited life expectancies such as those of very advanced age ≥80 years, long-term nursing home residents, and the cognitively impaired. When potential harms, remaining life years, and the viability of available treatments are considered, the burdens of screening mammography often outweigh the benefits for older women. For some cases, an individualized approach to recommendations would be appropriate. National guidelines should be updated to provide clear guidance for screening women of advanced age, especially those in special populations with limited life expectancies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; guidelines; mammography; nursing homes; older adults; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30625008      PMCID: PMC6590712          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  58 in total

Review 1.  Clinical inquiries. When should we stop mammography screening for breast cancer in elderly women?

Authors:  B L Parnes; P C Smith; C M Conry; H Domke
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Mammography-related anxiety: effect of preprocedural patient education.

Authors:  M B Mainiero; B Schepps; N C Clements; C E Bird
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

3.  Monitoring women's experiences during three rounds of breast cancer screening: results from a longitudinal study.

Authors:  C H C Drossaert; H Boer; E R Seydel
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Does mammography hurt?

Authors:  Rama Sapir; Michael Patlas; Shalom David Strano; Irit Hadas-Halpern; Nathan I Cherny
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Population ageing in the United States of America: implications for public programmes.

Authors:  Joshua M Wiener; Jane Tilly
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Screening mammography for frail older women: what are the burdens?

Authors:  L C Walter; C Eng; K E Covinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.

Authors:  L C Walter; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Reported pain following mammography screening.

Authors:  Penny C Sharp; Robert Michielutte; Rita Freimanis; Louise Cunningham; John Spangler; Virginia Burnette
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-14

9.  Breast cancer acute radiotherapy morbidity evaluated by different scoring systems.

Authors:  Escarlata López; M Isabel Núñez; M Rosario Guerrero; Rosario del Moral; Juan de Dios Luna; M del Mar Rodríguez; M Teresa Valenzuela; Mercedes Villalobos; José Mariano Ruiz de Almodóvar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Factors influencing mammography use among women in Medicare managed care.

Authors:  J K Barr; S Reisine; Y Wang; E F Holmboe; K L Cohen; T J Van Hoof; T P Meehan
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2001
View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of serum Nestin and HOTAIR rs12826786 C>T polymorphism as screening tools for breast cancer in Egyptian women.

Authors:  Sarah A Aglan; Mohamed Elsammak; Omar Elsammak; Eman A El-Bakoury; Heba G Elsheredy; Yasser S Ahmed; Mohamed H Sultan; Ahmed M Awad
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.402

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.