Literature DB >> 17186459

Powerful multilocus tests of genetic association in the presence of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.

Nilanjan Chatterjee1, Zeynep Kalaylioglu, Roxana Moslehi, Ulrike Peters, Sholom Wacholder.   

Abstract

In modern genetic epidemiology studies, the association between the disease and a genomic region, such as a candidate gene, is often investigated using multiple SNPs. We propose a multilocus test of genetic association that can account for genetic effects that might be modified by variants in other genes or by environmental factors. We consider use of the venerable and parsimonious Tukey's 1-degree-of-freedom model of interaction, which is natural when individual SNPs within a gene are associated with disease through a common biological mechanism; in contrast, many standard regression models are designed as if each SNP has unique functional significance. On the basis of Tukey's model, we propose a novel but computationally simple generalized test of association that can simultaneously capture both the main effects of the variants within a genomic region and their interactions with the variants in another region or with an environmental exposure. We compared performance of our method with that of two standard tests of association, one ignoring gene-gene/gene-environment interactions and the other based on a saturated model of interactions. We demonstrate major power advantages of our method both in analysis of data from a case-control study of the association between colorectal adenoma and DNA variants in the NAT2 genomic region, which are well known to be related to a common biological phenotype, and under different models of gene-gene interactions with use of simulated data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17186459      PMCID: PMC1698705          DOI: 10.1086/509704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  37 in total

Review 1.  Association study designs for complex diseases.

Authors:  L R Cardon; J I Bell
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Charles M Rowland; David E Tines; Robert M Jacobson; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes.

Authors:  G C Johnson; L Esposito; B J Barratt; A N Smith; J Heward; G Di Genova; H Ueda; H J Cordell; I A Eaves; F Dudbridge; R C Twells; F Payne; W Hughes; S Nutland; H Stevens; P Carr; E Tuomilehto-Wolf; J Tuomilehto; S C Gough; D G Clayton; J A Todd
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Gene-environment interaction and affected sib pair linkage analysis.

Authors:  W J Gauderman; K D Siegmund
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Marylyn D Ritchie; Lance W Hahn; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Sample size calculations for population- and family-based case-control association studies on marker genotypes.

Authors:  Ruth M Pfeiffer; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Choosing haplotype-tagging SNPS based on unphased genotype data using a preliminary sample of unrelated subjects with an example from the Multiethnic Cohort Study.

Authors:  Daniel O Stram; Christopher A Haiman; Joel N Hirschhorn; David Altshuler; Laurence N Kolonel; Brian E Henderson; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  R Sachidanandam; D Weissman; S C Schmidt; J M Kakol; L D Stein; G Marth; S Sherry; J C Mullikin; B J Mortimore; D L Willey; S E Hunt; C G Cole; P C Coggill; C M Rice; Z Ning; J Rogers; D R Bentley; P Y Kwok; E R Mardis; R T Yeh; B Schultz; L Cook; R Davenport; M Dante; L Fulton; L Hillier; R H Waterston; J D McPherson; B Gilman; S Schaffner; W J Van Etten; D Reich; J Higgins; M J Daly; B Blumenstiel; J Baldwin; N Stange-Thomann; M C Zody; L Linton; E S Lander; D Altshuler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Etiologic and early marker studies in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial.

Authors:  R B Hayes; D Reding; W Kopp; A F Subar; N Bhat; N Rothman; N Caporaso; R G Ziegler; C C Johnson; J L Weissfeld; R N Hoover; P Hartge; C Palace; J K Gohagan
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

Review 10.  Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium.

Authors:  N J Risch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  88 in total

1.  Testing gene-environment interaction in large-scale case-control association studies: possible choices and comparisons.

Authors:  Bhramar Mukherjee; Jaeil Ahn; Stephen B Gruber; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A note on the effect on power of score tests via dimension reduction by penalized regression under the null.

Authors:  Josue G Martinez; Raymond J Carroll; Samuel Muller; Joshua N Sampson; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models.

Authors:  Sholom Wacholder; Patricia Hartge; Ross Prentice; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Heather Spencer Feigelson; W Ryan Diver; Michael J Thun; David G Cox; Susan E Hankinson; Peter Kraft; Bernard Rosner; Christine D Berg; Louise A Brinton; Jolanta Lissowska; Mark E Sherman; Rowan Chlebowski; Charles Kooperberg; Rebecca D Jackson; Dennis W Buckman; Peter Hui; Ruth Pfeiffer; Kevin B Jacobs; Gilles D Thomas; Robert N Hoover; Mitchell H Gail; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The meaning of interaction.

Authors:  Xuefeng Wang; Robert C Elston; Xiaofeng Zhu
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Efficient p-value evaluation for resampling-based tests.

Authors:  Kai Yu; Faming Liang; Julia Ciampa; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Gene-based interaction analysis by incorporating external linkage disequilibrium information.

Authors:  Jing He; Kai Wang; Andrew C Edmondson; Daniel J Rader; Chun Li; Mingyao Li
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  A latent variable approach to study gene-environment interactions in the presence of multiple correlated exposures.

Authors:  Brisa N Sánchez; Shan Kang; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Structures and Assumptions: Strategies to Harness Gene × Gene and Gene × Environment Interactions in GWAS.

Authors:  Charles Kooperberg; Michael Leblanc; James Y Dai; Indika Rajapakse
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.901

9.  Adaptively weighted association statistics.

Authors:  Michael LeBlanc; Charles Kooperberg
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  A meta-analytic framework for detection of genetic interactions.

Authors:  Yulun Liu; Yong Chen; Paul Scheet
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.