Literature DB >> 15785943

Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material.

Georg Eggers1, Marcus Rieker, Bodo Kress, Jochen Fiebach, Hartmut Dickhaus, Stefan Hassfeld.   

Abstract

A common problem in computer tomography (CT) based imaging of the oral cavity is artefacts caused by dental restorations. The aim of this study was to investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the oral cavity would be less affected than CT by artefacts caused by typical dental restorative alloys. In order to assess the extent of artefact generation, corresponding MRI scans of the same anatomic region with and without dental metal restorations were matched using a stereotactic frame. MRI imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region could be performed without reduction of the image quality by metallic dental restorations made from titanium, gold or amalgam. Dental restorations made from titanium, gold or amalgam did not reduce the image quality of the MRI sequence used in imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region for dental implant planning. In this respect MRI is superior to CT in implant planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15785943     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-005-0101-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  11 in total

1.  Effect of interference of metallic objects on interpretation of T1-weighted magnetic resonance images in the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  K Abbaszadeh; L B Heffez; M F Mafee
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-06

2.  Impact of metallic dental implants on CT-based attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  EhabI M Kamel; Cyrill Burger; Alfred Buck; GustavI K von Schulthess; GerhardI W Goerres
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents)].

Authors:  H Graf; T Klemm; U A Lauer; S Duda; C D Claussen; F Schick
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2003-12

4.  Implant imaging for the dentist.

Authors:  Muralidhar Mupparapu; Steven R Singer
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 5.  Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Crawford F Gray; Thomas W Redpath; Francis W Smith; Roger T Staff
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Shafiei; E Honda; H Takahashi; T Sasaki
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  An assessment of the accuracy of ridge-mapping in planning implant therapy for the anterior maxilla.

Authors:  F Allen; D G Smith
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Comparison of CT imaging artifacts from craniomaxillofacial internal fixation devices.

Authors:  T G Fiala; R A Novelline; M J Yaremchuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  A method of eliminating streak artifacts from metallic dental restorations in CTs of head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  O Odlum
Journal:  Spec Care Dentist       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

10.  Dental bur fragments causing metal artifacts on MR images.

Authors:  T Kaneda; M Minami; H D Curtin; T Utsunomiya; I Shirouzu; M Yamashiro; H Kiba; H Yamamoto; S Ohba
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  27 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artefacts in hip prostheses: a comparison of different prosthetic compositions.

Authors:  Elisabetta Panfili; Laura Pierdicca; Luca Salvolini; Luigi Imperiale; Jeffrey Dubbini; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Advances in diagnostic imaging for pathologic conditions of the jaws.

Authors:  Byron W Benson; Diane J Flint; Hui Liang; Michael J Opatowsky
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2014-11-20

3.  PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging.

Authors:  Tim Hilgenfeld; Marcel Prager; Alexander Heil; Franz Sebastian Schwindling; Mathias Nittka; David Grodzki; Peter Rammelsberg; Martin Bendszus; Sabine Heiland
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  High isotropic resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the mandibular canal at 1.5 T: a comparison of gradient and spin echo sequences.

Authors:  Jakob Kreutner; Andreas Hopfgartner; Daniel Weber; Julian Boldt; Kurt Rottner; Ernst Richter; Peter Michael Jakob; Daniel Haddad
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of solid dental restoration materials using 3D UTE sequences: visualization and relaxometry of various compounds.

Authors:  Ulrich Grosse; Roland Syha; Dimitrios Papanikolaou; Petros Martirosian; Gerd Grözinger; Christoph Schabel; Fritz Schick; Fabian Springer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Influence of dental materials on dental MRI.

Authors:  O Tymofiyeva; S Vaegler; K Rottner; J Boldt; A J Hopfgartner; P C Proff; E J Richter; P M Jakob
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Quantitative assessment of artifacts on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Takeshi Sasaki; Rozann Hansford; Menekhem M Zviman; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; David A Bluemke; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 8.  Should the orthodontic brackets always be removed prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?

Authors:  Arash Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir; Manouchehr Rahmati-Kamel
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-09-15

9.  A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging.

Authors:  Shumei Murakami; Rinus G Verdonschot; Miyoshi Kataoka; Naoya Kakimoto; Hiroaki Shimamoto; Sven Kreiborg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced videofluoroscopy to unenhanced dynamic MRI in minor patients following surgical correction of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

Authors:  C T Arendt; K Eichler; M G Mack; D Leithner; S Zhang; K T Block; Y Berdan; R Sader; J L Wichmann; T Gruber-Rouh; T J Vogl; M C Hoelter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.