Literature DB >> 8248397

Comparison of CT imaging artifacts from craniomaxillofacial internal fixation devices.

T G Fiala1, R A Novelline, M J Yaremchuk.   

Abstract

This study compares the artifacts caused by craniomaxillofacial internal fixation devices in CT images. Mandibular reconstruction and "mini" titanium, Vitallium, and stainless steel systems, "micro" titanium and Vitallium systems, and stainless steel wires were evaluated. The hardware was placed on a nylon grid and submerged in water. CT images were obtained with both bone and soft-tissue window settings. All artifacts were compared and graded after a minimum of five observations each. The severity of "starburst" artifact was found to be related to the physical size of the fixation hardware and its composition. Titanium hardware caused the least amount of artifact. Vitallium and stainless steel fixation devices, with the exception of interfragmentary wiring, produced significantly more artifact. These results agree with theoretical predictions. The data indicate that when postoperative imaging is an important clinical consideration, (1) the least amount of implant material necessary to achieve stable fixation should be used, (2) the proximity of implant material to the area of interest should be considered, and (3) titanium implants produce less artifact than Vitallium or stainless steel implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8248397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  14 in total

1.  Choice of internal rigid fixation materials in the treatment of facial fractures.

Authors:  Mirko S Gilardino; Elliot Chen; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-03

2.  Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material.

Authors:  Georg Eggers; Marcus Rieker; Bodo Kress; Jochen Fiebach; Hartmut Dickhaus; Stefan Hassfeld
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Analysis of metal artifact reduction tools for dental hardware in CT scans of the oral cavity: kVp, iterative reconstruction, dual-energy CT, metal artifact reduction software: does it make a difference?

Authors:  An De Crop; Jan Casselman; Tom Van Hoof; Melissa Dierens; Elke Vereecke; Nicolas Bossu; Jaime Pamplona; Katharina D'Herde; Hubert Thierens; Klaus Bacher
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Current applications of advanced cross-sectional imaging techniques in evaluating the painful arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carolyn M Sofka
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Resorbable Versus Titanium Rigid Fixation for Pediatric Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review, Institutional Experience and Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew E Pontell; Eva B Niklinska; Stephane A Braun; Nolan Jaeger; Kevin J Kelly; Michael S Golinko
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-21

6.  Management of pediatric mandibular fractures using bioresorbable plating system - Efficacy, stability, and clinical outcomes: Our experiences and literature review.

Authors:  Mahinder Singh; R K Singh; Deepak Passi; Mohit Aggarwal; Guneet Kaur
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-10-17

7.  3D imaging with an isocentric mobile C-arm comparison of image quality with spiral CT.

Authors:  Dorothea Kotsianos; Stefan Wirth; Tanja Fischer; Ekkehard Euler; Clemens Rock; Ulrich Linsenmaier; Klaus Jürgen Pfeifer; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Effective correction of frontal cranial deformities using biodegradable fixation on the inner surface of the cranial bones during infancy.

Authors:  Willy S Serlo; Leena P Ylikontiola; Anna-Liisa Vesala; Outi I Kaarela; Tarja Iber; George K B Sándor; Nureddin Ashammakhi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography caused by dental materials.

Authors:  Thomas Klinke; Amro Daboul; Juliane Maron; Tomasz Gredes; Ralf Puls; Ahmad Jaghsi; Reiner Biffar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Material Science in Cervical Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Martin H Pham; Vivek A Mehta; Alexander Tuchman; Patrick C Hsieh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.