Literature DB >> 15781713

The origin of subfunctions and modular gene regulation.

Allan Force1, William A Cresko, F Bryan Pickett, Steven R Proulx, Chris Amemiya, Michael Lynch.   

Abstract

Evolutionary explanations for the origin of modularity in genetic and developmental pathways generally assume that modularity confers a selective advantage. However, our results suggest that even in the absence of any direct selective advantage, genotypic modularity may increase through the formation of new subfunctions under near-neutral processes. Two subfunctions may be formed from a single ancestral subfunction by the process of fission. Subfunction fission occurs when multiple functions under unified genetic control become subdivided into more restricted functions under independent genetic control. Provided that population size is sufficiently small, random genetic drift and mutation can conspire to produce changes in the number of subfunctions in the genome of a species without necessarily altering the phenotype. Extensive genotypic modularity may then accrue in a near-neutral fashion in permissive population-genetic environments, potentially opening novel pathways to morphological evolution. Many aspects of gene complexity in multicellular eukaryotes may have arisen passively as population size reductions accompanied increases in organism size, with the adaptive exploitation of such complexity occurring secondarily.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15781713      PMCID: PMC1449736          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.027607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  38 in total

1.  On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution.

Authors:  A Stoltzfus
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Modularity in animal development and evolution: elements of a conceptual framework for EvoDevo.

Authors:  G von Dassow; E Munro
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1999-12-15

3.  Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element.

Authors:  M Z Ludwig; C Bergman; N H Patel; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization.

Authors:  M Lynch; A Force
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Chance and necessity: the evolution of morphological complexity and diversity.

Authors:  S B Carroll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  High sequence turnover in the regulatory regions of the developmental gene hunchback in insects.

Authors:  J M Hancock; P J Shaw; F Bonneton; G A Dover
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  The fate of duplicated genes: loss or new function?

Authors:  A Wagner
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Genomes were forged by massive bombardments with retroelements and retrosequences.

Authors:  J Brosius
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 9.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.

Authors:  A Force; M Lynch; F B Pickett; A Amores; Y L Yan; J Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Synthetic promoter elements obtained by nucleotide sequence variation and selection for activity.

Authors:  G M Edelman; R Meech; G C Owens; F S Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  39 in total

1.  Surprising flexibility in a conserved Hox transcription factor over 550 million years of evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jeffrey W Shultz; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Multiple routes to subfunctionalization and gene duplicate specialization.

Authors:  Stephen R Proulx
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Anciently duplicated Broad Complex exons have distinct temporal functions during tissue morphogenesis.

Authors:  Rebecca F Spokony; Linda L Restifo
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolutionary analysis of the small heat shock proteins in five complete algal genomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Waters; Ignatius Rioflorido
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Segmental duplications contribute to gene expression differences between humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Ran Blekhman; Alicia Oshlack; Yoav Gilad
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Gene and genome duplications: the impact of dosage-sensitivity on the fate of nuclear genes.

Authors:  Patrick P Edger; J Chris Pires
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Domain duplication, divergence, and loss events in vertebrate Msx paralogs reveal phylogenomically informed disease markers.

Authors:  John R Finnerty; Maureen E Mazza; Peter A Jezewski
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  On theoretical models of gene expression evolution with random genetic drift and natural selection.

Authors:  Osamu Ogasawara; Kousaku Okubo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Extinctions in heterogeneous environments and the evolution of modularity.

Authors:  Nadav Kashtan; Merav Parter; Erez Dekel; Avi E Mayo; Uri Alon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.