Literature DB >> 15777395

Clinical utility of a de-functioning loop ileostomy.

Cameron Platell1, Nigel Barwood, Gregory Makin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The de-functioning loop ileostomy was introduced as a technique to create a manageable stoma that would divert the faecal stream from a more distal anastomosis in order to reduce the consequences of any anastomotic leakage. The value of de-functioning stomas is currently being challenged. The purpose of the present study was to review the clinical utility of performing a de-functioning loop ileostomy in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
METHODS: A review was undertaken of a prospective colorectal database maintained at Fremantle Hospital. All end-points were defined prior to the collection of data. The study reviewed the indications and type of surgery performed. The main end-points included (i) the prevalence and management of anastomotic leaks at the primary surgery; (ii) unplanned readmissions prior to stoma closure; and (iii) the mortality, reoperation rate, and morbidity associated with closure of the stoma.
RESULTS: The study involved 233 patients of mean age 58 years (range 15-89 years) and a male:female ratio of 1.1:1. The majority of patients were undergoing elective surgery (82%) for colorectal neoplasia (71%). The commonest surgical procedure was an ultra-low anterior resection (62%). At the initial surgery, 16 patients (7.0%) developed anastomotic leaks, but only two (0.9%) required reoperation. Eleven patients (4.8%) required 12 unplanned readmissions prior to stoma closure. At closure (n = 230), there were no postoperative deaths, one patient developed an ileal anastomotic leak that was managed with antibiotics, and five patients (2.2%) required reoperation within 30 days of surgery.
CONCLUSION: De-functioning loop ileostomy was found to be associated with a relatively low morbidity and no mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15777395     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03317.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  9 in total

Review 1.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy.

Authors:  F De Haes; N L Bullen; G A Antoniou; N J Smart; S A Antoniou
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Diverted versus undiverted restorative proctocolectomy for chronic ulcerative colitis: an analysis of long-term outcomes after pouch leak short title: outcomes after pouch leak.

Authors:  Maria Widmar; Jordan A Munger; Alex Mui; Stephen R Gorfine; David B Chessin; Daniel A Popowich; Joel J Bauer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without primary diverting loop ileostomy if postoperative sepsis develops.

Authors:  O A Lavryk; T L Hull; L C Duraes; L Stocchi; J H Ashburn; D Liska; E Gorgun; H Kessler
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Proximal intestinal diversion is associated with increased morbidity in patients undergoing elective colectomy for diverticular disease: an ACS-NSQIP study.

Authors:  Kevin B Wise; Amit Merchea; Robert R Cima; Dorin T Colibaseanu; Kristine M Thomsen; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Does mesorectal preservation protect the ileoanal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy?

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Morbidity of ostomy takedown.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Shlomo Israelit; Daniel Klaristenfeld; Paul Selvindoss; Petar Vukasin; Glenn Ault; Robert W Beart
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Factors affecting pouch-related outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Gyoung Tae Noh; Jeonghee Han; Min Soo Cho; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy with restorative proctocolectomy for rectal cancer: Friend or foe?

Authors:  Shinya Munakata; Shingo Ito; Kiichi Sugimoto; Yutaka Kojima; Michitoshi Goto; Yuichi Tomiki; Kazuhiro Sakamoto
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2018-05-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.