Literature DB >> 15773626

Accurate convolution/superposition for multi-resolution dose calculation using cumulative tabulated kernels.

Weiguo Lu1, Gustavo H Olivera, Ming-Li Chen, Paul J Reckwerdt, Thomas R Mackie.   

Abstract

Convolution/superposition (C/S) is regarded as the standard dose calculation method in most modern radiotherapy treatment planning systems. Different implementations of C/S could result in significantly different dose distributions. This paper addresses two major implementation issues associated with collapsed cone C/S: one is how to utilize the tabulated kernels instead of analytical parametrizations and the other is how to deal with voxel size effects. Three methods that utilize the tabulated kernels are presented in this paper. These methods differ in the effective kernels used: the differential kernel (DK), the cumulative kernel (CK) or the cumulative-cumulative kernel (CCK). They result in slightly different computation times but significantly different voxel size effects. Both simulated and real multi-resolution dose calculations are presented. For simulation tests, we use arbitrary kernels and various voxel sizes with a homogeneous phantom, and assume forward energy transportation only. Simulations with voxel size up to 1 cm show that the CCK algorithm has errors within 0.1% of the maximum gold standard dose. Real dose calculations use a heterogeneous slab phantom, both the 'broad' (5 x 5 cm2) and the 'narrow' (1.2 x 1.2 cm2) tomotherapy beams. Various voxel sizes (0.5 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm and 8 mm) are used for dose calculations. The results show that all three algorithms have negligible difference (0.1%) for the dose calculation in the fine resolution (0.5 mm voxels). But differences become significant when the voxel size increases. As for the DK or CK algorithm in the broad (narrow) beam dose calculation, the dose differences between the 0.5 mm voxels and the voxels up to 8 mm (4 mm) are around 10% (7%) of the maximum dose. As for the broad (narrow) beam dose calculation using the CCK algorithm, the dose differences between the 0.5 mm voxels and the voxels up to 8 mm (4 mm) are around 1% of the maximum dose. Among all three methods, the CCK algorithm is demonstrated to be the most accurate one for multi-resolution dose calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773626     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/4/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  On the making of sharp longitudinal dose profiles with helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Michael W Kissick; Ryan T Flynn; David C Westerly; Thomas Rockwell Mackie; Peter W Hoban
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The impact of linac output variations on dose distributions in helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  R T Flynn; M W Kissick; M P Mehta; G H Olivera; R Jeraj; T R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Skin dose study of chest wall treatment with tomotherapy.

Authors:  Khosrow Javedan; Geoffrey Zhang; Richard Mueller; Eleanor Harris; Lawrence Berk; Kenneth Forster
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Multisource modeling of flattening filter free (FFF) beam and the optimization of model parameters.

Authors:  Woong Cho; Kayla N Kielar; Ed Mok; Lei Xing; Jeong-Hoon Park; Won-Gyun Jung; Tae-Suk Suh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Parallel beamlet dose calculation via beamlet contexts in a distributed multi-GPU framework.

Authors:  Ryan Neph; Cheng Ouyang; John Neylon; Youming Yang; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  IMRT and SBRT Treatment Planning Study for the First Clinical Biology-Guided Radiotherapy System.

Authors:  Daniel Pham; Eric Simiele; Dylan Breitkreutz; Dante Capaldi; Bin Han; Murat Surucu; Seyi Oderinde; Lucas Vitzthum; Michael Gensheimer; Hilary Bagshaw; Alex Chin; Lei Xing; D T Chang; Natalyia Kovalchuk
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

7.  On the impact of longitudinal breathing motion randomness for tomotherapy delivery.

Authors:  Michael W Kissick; Ryan T Flynn; David C Westerly; Peter W Hoban; Xiaohu Mo; Emilie T Soisson; Keisha C McCall; Thomas R Mackie; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Considering inhomogeneities in Gamma Knife treatment planning: Factors affecting the loss of prescription dose coverage.

Authors:  William N Duggar; Rui He; Rahul Bhandari; Madhava Kanakamedala; Bart Morris; Roberto Rey-Dios; Srinivasan Vijayakumar; Claus Chunli Yang
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2020

9.  Dosimetric accuracy of tomotherapy dose calculation in thorax lesions.

Authors:  Veronica Ardu; Sara Broggi; Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo; Paola Mangili; Riccardo Calandrino
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  The technical design and concept of a PET/CT linac for biology-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Oluwaseyi M Oderinde; Shervin M Shirvani; Peter D Olcott; Gopinath Kuduvalli; Samuel Mazin; David Larkin
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.