Literature DB >> 22787288

A probabilistic model of eye movements in concept formation.

Jonathan D Nelson1, Garrison W Cottrell.   

Abstract

It has been unclear whether optimal experimental design accounts of data selection may offer insight into evidence acquisition tasks in which the learner's beliefs change greatly during the course of learning. Data from Rehder and Hoffman's eye movement version of Shepard, Horland and Jenkins' classic concept learning task provide an opportunity to address these issues. We introduce a principled probabilistic concept-learning model that describes the development of subjects' beliefs on that task. We use that learning model, together with a sampling function inspired by theory of optimal experimental design, to predict subjects' eye movements on the active learning version of that task. Results show that the same rational sampling function can predict eye movements early in learning, when uncertainty is high, as well as late in learning when the learner is certain of the true category.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 22787288      PMCID: PMC3392133          DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocomputing        ISSN: 0925-2312            Impact factor:   5.719


  19 in total

1.  Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning.

Authors:  J Feldman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference.

Authors:  J B Tenenbaum; T L Griffiths
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt; In Jae Myung; Shaobo Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements.

Authors:  Julia Trommershäuser; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 5.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search.

Authors:  Jiri Najemnik; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Neural differentiation of expected reward and risk in human subcortical structures.

Authors:  Kerstin Preuschoff; Peter Bossaerts; Steven R Quartz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  7 in total

1.  How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: an eyetracking study.

Authors:  Shinwoo Kim; Bob Rehder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

2.  Reading as active sensing: a computational model of gaze planning in word recognition.

Authors:  Marcello Ferro; Dimitri Ognibene; Giovanni Pezzulo; Vito Pirrelli
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Active sensing in the categorization of visual patterns.

Authors:  Scott Cheng-Hsin Yang; Máté Lengyel; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Experience matters: information acquisition optimizes probability gain.

Authors:  Jonathan D Nelson; Craig R M McKenzie; Garrison W Cottrell; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-06-04

5.  LAG-1: A dynamic, integrative model of learning, attention, and gaze.

Authors:  Jordan Barnes; Mark R Blair; R Calen Walshe; Paul F Tupper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Children flexibly seek visual information to support signed and spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Kyle MacDonald; Virginia A Marchman; Anne Fernald; Michael C Frank
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-11-21

7.  Bidirectional influences of information sampling and concept learning.

Authors:  Kurt Braunlich; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 8.247

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.