Literature DB >> 15770662

An improved nucleic acid parameter set for the GROMOS force field.

Thereza A Soares1, Philippe H Hünenberger, Mika A Kastenholz, Vincent Kräutler, Thomas Lenz, Roberto D Lins, Chris Oostenbrink, Wilfred F van Gunsteren.   

Abstract

Over the past decades, the GROMOS force field for biomolecular simulation has primarily been developed for performing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of polypeptides and, to a lesser extent, sugars. When applied to DNA, the 43A1 and 45A3 parameter sets of the years 1996 and 2001 produced rather flexible double-helical structures, in which the Watson-Crick hydrogen-bonding content was more limited than expected. To improve on the currently available parameter sets, the nucleotide backbone torsional-angle parameters and the charge distribution of the nucleotide bases are reconsidered based on quantum-chemical data. The new 45A4 parameter set resulting from this refinement appears to perform well in terms of reproducing solution NMR data and canonical hydrogen bonding. The deviation between simulated and experimental observables is now of the same order of magnitude as the uncertainty in the experimental values themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15770662     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  50 in total

1.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Thereza A Soares; Nico F A van der Vegt; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Configurational entropy change of netropsin and distamycin upon DNA minor-groove binding.

Authors:  Jozica Dolenc; Riccardo Baron; Chris Oostenbrink; Joze Koller; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The transition between the B and Z conformations of DNA investigated by targeted molecular dynamics simulations with explicit solvation.

Authors:  Mika A Kastenholz; Thomas U Schwartz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the native and partially folded states of ubiquitin: influence of methanol cosolvent, pH, and temperature on the protein structure and dynamics.

Authors:  David B Kony; Philippe H Hünenberger; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Molecular dynamics simulations of nucleic acid-protein complexes.

Authors:  Alexander D Mackerell; Lennart Nilsson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Importance of lipid-pore loop interface for potassium channel structure and function.

Authors:  Elwin A W van der Cruijsen; Deepak Nand; Markus Weingarth; Alexander Prokofyev; Sönke Hornig; Abhishek Arun Cukkemane; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Stefan Becker; Raymond E Hulse; Eduardo Perozo; Olaf Pongs; Marc Baldus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Metal Ion Modeling Using Classical Mechanics.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Molecular modeling of nucleic acid structure: setup and analysis.

Authors:  T E Cheatham; B R Brooks; P A Kollman
Journal:  Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem       Date:  2001-11

9.  Optimization of the CHARMM additive force field for DNA: Improved treatment of the BI/BII conformational equilibrium.

Authors:  Katarina Hart; Nicolas Foloppe; Christopher M Baker; Elizabeth J Denning; Lennart Nilsson; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  The role of nonbonded interactions in the conformational dynamics of organophosphorous hydrolase adsorbed onto functionalized mesoporous silica surfaces.

Authors:  Diego E B Gomes; Roberto D Lins; Pedro G Pascutti; Chenghong Lei; Thereza A Soares
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.