Literature DB >> 15770381

Profiling hospital performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on the administrative data of four teaching hospitals in Japan.

Masahiro Hirose1, Yuichi Imanaka, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Miho Sekimoto, Yoshiaki Harada, Kazuaki Kuwabara, Kenshi Hayashida, Eun-Hwan Oh, S Edward Evans.   

Abstract

Over the last decade in Japan, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has replaced traditional open cholecystectomy as the standard of elective surgery for cholelithiasis. The laparoscopic approach has a clinical course relatively easier to standardize among the different types of intraabdominal surgery. However, significant practice variation is suspected in Japan, but there has been little demonstration or discussion based on empirical data. Through the analysis of 1589 elective LC cases from four leading teaching hospitals in Japan between 1996 and 2000, this study aims to demonstrate the surgical variations and to investigate their determinants regarding the length of hospital stay and the health care charge. Substantially and significantly large variation existed among the hospitals in terms of the length of hospital stay and the total health care charge, even after the differences in patient factors were adjusted. Particularly, the combined drug and exam charge per day was strikingly different among the four hospitals, which indicated that the daily process also varied widely, as did the total course of inpatient care. In addition, intra-hospital variation was also remained very large even after adjusting for all the potential correlates studied. This study alarmingly points out great room for improvement in the efficiency of health care resource use and potentially in the quality of care through standardization of LC. It has serious implications for the national policy and individual providers under the on-going health care reforms directed toward higher efficiency and quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15770381     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7535-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  13 in total

Review 1.  Costs and benefits of laparoscopic surgery--a review of the literature.

Authors:  B Jönsson; N Zethraeus
Journal:  Eur J Surg Suppl       Date:  2000

2.  Laparoscopic or open conventional cholecystectomy: clinical and economic considerations.

Authors:  Florian Bosch; Ursula Wehrman; Hans-Detlef Saeger; Wilhelm Kirch
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

Review 3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Masaori Aramaki; Katsunori Kawano
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2002

4.  Physician-management relationships at HCA: a case study.

Authors:  P Campbell; N M Kane
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.265

5.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  How can we improve the quality of health care in Japan? Learning from JCQHC hospital accreditation.

Authors:  Masahiro Hirose; Yuichi Imanaka; Tatsuro Ishizaki; Edward Evans
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; F Dubois; J Mouiel; P Mouret; H Becker; G Buess; M Trede; H Troidl
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Variations in rates of hospitalization of children in three urban communities.

Authors:  J M Perrin; C J Homer; D M Berwick; A D Woolf; J L Freeman; J E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-05-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

10.  Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway.

Authors:  K McPherson; J E Wennberg; O B Hovind; P Clifford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Variations in the preoperative resources use and the practice pattern in Japanese cholecystectomy patients.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kuwabara; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Koichi B Ishikawa; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Kenji Fujimori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Quantitative comparison of the difficulty of performing laparoscopic colectomy at different tumor locations.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kuwabara; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Koichi B Ishikawa; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Kenji Fujimori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Impact of hospital case volume on the quality of laparoscopic colectomy in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kuwabara; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Koichi B Ishikawa; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Kenji Fujimori
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Impact of treatment policies on patient outcomes and resource utilization in acute cholecystitis in Japanese hospitals.

Authors:  Miho Sekimoto; Yuichi Imanaka; Masahiro Hirose; Tatsuro Ishizaki; Genki Murakami; Yushi Fukata
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.