Literature DB >> 7133068

Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway.

K McPherson, J E Wennberg, O B Hovind, P Clifford.   

Abstract

We examined the incidence of seven common surgical procedures in seven hospital service areas in southern Norway, in 21 districts in the West Midlands of the United Kingdom, and in the 18 most heavily populated hospital service areas in Vermont, Maine, and Rhode Island. Although surgical rates were higher in the New England states than in the United Kingdom or Norway, there was no greater degree of variability in the rates of surgery among the service areas within the three New England states. Hernia repair was more variable in England (P less than 0.05) and hysterectomy in Norway (P less than 0.05) than in the other countries. There was consistency among countries in the rank order of variability for most procedures: tonsillectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, hysterectomy, and prostatectomy varied more from area to area than did appendectomy, hernia repair, or cholecystectomy. The degree of variation generally appeared to be more characteristic of the procedure than of the country in which it was performed. Thus, differences among countries in the methods of organizing and financing care appear to have little relation to the intrinsic variability in the incidence of common surgical procedures among hospital service areas in these countries. Despite the differences in average rates of use, the degrees of controversy and uncertainty concerning the indications for these procedures seem to be similar among clinicians in all three countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7133068     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  170 in total

1.  Regional variations in the use of home care services in Ontario, 1993/95.

Authors:  P C Coyte; W Young
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-08-24       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Equity - some theory and its policy implications.

Authors:  A J Culyer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Ethics and health care 'underfunding'.

Authors:  A Maynard
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand.

Authors:  A Dharmalingam; I Pool; J Dickson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Quintana; J Cabriada; I López de Tejada; M Varona; V Oribe; B Barrios; I Aróstegui; A Bilbao
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

6.  Team Learning for Healthcare Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Narine Manukyan; Margaret J Eppstein; Jeffrey D Horbar
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  Socioeconomic variations in hysterectomy: evidence from a linkage study of the Finnish hospital discharge register and population census.

Authors:  R Luoto; I Keskimäki; A Reunanen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Diversity and disparity: GIS and small-area analysis in six Chicago neighborhoods.

Authors:  Steven Whitman; Abigail Silva; Ami Shah; David Ansell
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  A small area simulation approach to determining excess variation in dental procedure rates.

Authors:  P Diehr; D Grembowski
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Revascularization after acute myocardial infarction: impact of hospital teaching status and on-site invasive facilities.

Authors:  J L Cox; E Chen; C D Naylor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.