Literature DB >> 20339988

Variations in the preoperative resources use and the practice pattern in Japanese cholecystectomy patients.

Kazuaki Kuwabara1, Shinya Matsuda, Kiyohide Fushimi, Koichi B Ishikawa, Hiromasa Horiguchi, Kenji Fujimori.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are several preoperative treatment options, such as the staged bile duct intervention (BDI), for the successful completion of a cholecystectomy, regardless of the use of an open cholecystectomy (OC) or a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, few studies have investigated how the characteristics of the patient or the hospital affect the preoperative resource use. This study determined the factors, including the hospital characteristics, associated with the preoperative resource utilization or with the treatment process.
METHODS: Cholecystectomy patients (n = 12 627) who were treated for benign gallbladder diseases were examined. The study variables were: the patient demographics; the comorbid conditions; the presence of inflammation; the BDI, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous gallbladder or common bile duct drainage, endoscopic sphincterotomy, clearance of choledocholithiasis; the preoperative length of stay (LOS) or the total charges; and the hospital region, ownership, and function. A multivariate analysis was used to measure the variables associated with the use of preoperative resources.
RESULTS: A total of 11,690 (85.1%) patients underwent LC. The inflammation was diagnosed in 72.5% of OC and 41.5% of LC patients. Bile duct intervention was performed in more of the OC patients. The preoperative BDI had a significantly greater impact on the LOS. The hospital demographics predicted the preoperative resource use and the implementation of the BDI.
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative BDI involved the use of more preoperative resources. A wide variation of the use of BDI was observed in the hospital demographics. Further study is needed to establish a preoperative treatment strategy for cholecystectomy patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20339988     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-009-4062-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  D-F Hong; Y Xin; D-W Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  Vijaya Sundararajan; Toni Henderson; Catherine Perry; Amanda Muggivan; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Profiling hospital performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on the administrative data of four teaching hospitals in Japan.

Authors:  Masahiro Hirose; Yuichi Imanaka; Tatsuro Ishizaki; Miho Sekimoto; Yoshiaki Harada; Kazuaki Kuwabara; Kenshi Hayashida; Eun-Hwan Oh; S Edward Evans
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Tamim Siddiqui; Alisdair MacDonald; Peter S Chong; John T Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores.

Authors:  B K Poulose; P G Arbogast; M D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Do patient or hospital demographics predict cholecystectomy outcomes? A nationwide study of 93,578 patients.

Authors:  A M Carbonell; A E Lincourt; K W Kercher; B D Matthews; W S Cobb; R F Sing; B T Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. A prospective comparative study in patients with acute vs. chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  P Pessaux; J J Tuech; C Rouge; R Duplessis; C Cervi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  M Johansson; A Thune; L Nelvin; M Stiernstam; B Westman; L Lundell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  How early is early laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis?

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle; Donna Tesi; Lewis M Flint; Steven M Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  The impact of gallbladder aspiration during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ali Ezer; Tarik Z Nursal; Tamer Colakoglu; Turgut Noyan; Gokhan Moray; Mehmet Haberal
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.