Literature DB >> 15754797

Recent developments in tissue-type imaging (TTI) for planning and monitoring treatment of prostate cancer.

Ernest J Feleppa1, Christopher R Porter, Jeffrey Ketterling, Paul Lee, Shreedevi Dasgupta, Stella Urban, Andrew Kalisz.   

Abstract

Because current methods of imaging prostate cancer are inadequate, biopsies cannot be effectively guided and treatment cannot be effectively planned and targeted. Therefore, our research is aimed at ultrasonically characterizing cancerous prostate tissue so that we can image it more effectively and thereby provide improved means of detecting, treating and monitoring prostate cancer. We base our characterization methods on spectrum analysis of radiofrequency (rf) echo signals combined with clinical variables such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Tissue typing using these parameters is performed by artificial neural networks. We employed and evaluated different approaches to data partitioning into training, validation, and test sets and different neural network configuration options. In this manner, we sought to determine what neural network configuration is optimal for these data and also to assess possible bias that might exist due to correlations among different data entries among the data for a given patient. The classification efficacy of each neural network configuration and data-partitioning method was measured using relative-operating-characteristic (ROC) methods. Neural network classification based on spectral parameters combined with clinical data generally produced ROC-curve areas of 0.80 compared to curve areas of 0.64 for conventional transrectal ultrasound imaging combined with clinical data. We then used the optimal neural network configuration to generate lookup tables that translate local spectral parameter values and global clinical-variable values into pixel values in tissue-type images (TTIs). TTIs continue to show cancerous regions successfully, and may prove to be particularly useful clinically in combination with other ultrasonic and nonultrasonic methods, e.g., magnetic-resonance spectroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15754797      PMCID: PMC1693478          DOI: 10.1177/016173460402600303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  9 in total

1.  Relationship of ultrasonic spectral parameters to features of tissue microstructure.

Authors:  F L Lizzi; M Ostromogilsky; E J Feleppa; M C Rorke; M M Yaremko
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 2.  ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 3.  Imaging prostate cancer: current and future applications.

Authors:  E A el-Gabry; E J Halpern; S E Strup; L G Gomella
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  Diagnostic spectrum analysis in ophthalmology: a physical perspective.

Authors:  E J Feleppa; F L Lizzi; D J Coleman; M M Yaremko
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Theoretical framework for spectrum analysis in ultrasonic tissue characterization.

Authors:  F L Lizzi; M Greenebaum; E J Feleppa; M Elbaum; D J Coleman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spectrum-analysis and neural networks for imaging to detect and treat prostate cancer.

Authors:  E J Feleppa; R D Ennis; P B Schiff; C S Wuu; A Kalisz; J Ketterling; S Urban; T Liu; W R Fair; C R Porter; J R Gillespie
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.578

7.  Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer.

Authors:  L Egevad; T Granfors; L Karlberg; A Bergh; P Stattin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Ultrasonic multifeature tissue characterization for prostate diagnostics.

Authors:  Ulrich Scheipers; Helmut Ermert; Hans-Joerg Sommerfeld; Miguel Garcia-Schürmann; Theodor Senge; Stathis Philippou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 9.  Emerging ultrasound technologies for early markers of disease.

Authors:  Ernest J Feleppa; S Kaisar Alam; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.434

  9 in total
  13 in total

1.  Improved visualization of high-intensity focused ultrasound lesions.

Authors:  Ronald H Silverman; Robert Muratore; Jeffrey A Ketterling; Jonathan Mamou; D Jackson Coleman; Ernest J Feleppa
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Analysis of the intensity of radio-frequency signals in intracranial ultrasonography of preterm infants.

Authors:  Ko Ichihashi; Yukari Yada; Naoto Takahashi; Yoko Honma; Mariko Momoi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Modeling the envelope statistics of three-dimensional high-frequency ultrasound echo signals from dissected human lymph nodes.

Authors:  Thanh Minh Bui; Alain Coron; Jonathan Mamou; Emi Saegusa-Beecroft; Tadashi Yamaguchi; Eugene Yanagihara; Junji Machi; S Lori Bridal; Ernest J Feleppa
Journal:  Jpn J Appl Phys (2008)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.480

4.  Analysis of Two Quantitative Ultrasound Approaches.

Authors:  Pauline Muleki-Seya; Aiguo Han; Michael P Andre; John W Erdman; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  A new Tissue Resonator Indenter Device and reliability study.

Authors:  Ming Jia; Jean W Zu; Alireza Hariri
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Tissue classification in intercostal and paravertebral ultrasound using spectral analysis of radiofrequency backscatter.

Authors:  Jon D Klingensmith; Asher L Haggard; Jack T Ralston; Beidi Qiang; Russell J Fedewa; Hesham Elsharkawy; David Geoffrey Vince
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-11-07

7.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of human prostates: initial in vivo demonstration.

Authors:  Liang Zhai; Thomas J Polascik; Wen-Chi Foo; Stephen Rosenzweig; Mark L Palmeri; John Madden; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Effects of Signal Saturation on QUS Parameter Estimates Based on High-Frequency-Ultrasound Signals Acquired From Isolated Cancerous Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Kazuki Tamura; Jonathan Mamou; Alain Coron; Kenji Yoshida; Ernest J Feleppa; Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  In vivo characterization of pancreatic and lymph node tissue by using EUS spectrum analysis: a validation study.

Authors:  Ronald E Kumon; Michael J Pollack; Ashley L Faulx; Kayode Olowe; Farees T Farooq; Victor K Chen; Yun Zhou; Richard C K Wong; Gerard A Isenberg; Michael V Sivak; Amitabh Chak; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; Jonathan Mamou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.