Literature DB >> 11301831

Imaging prostate cancer: current and future applications.

E A el-Gabry1, E J Halpern, S E Strup, L G Gomella.   

Abstract

Various treatment options are available for adenocarcinoma of the prostate--the most common malignant neoplasm among men in the United States. To select an optimum management strategy, we must be able to identify an organ-confined disease (in which local therapy such as surgery or radiation may be beneficial) vs prostate cancer beyond the confines of the gland (for which other treatment approaches may be more appropriate). At present, no standard imaging modality can by itself reliably diagnose and/or stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Standard transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography, bone scans, and plain x-ray are not sufficiently reliable when used alone. Fortunately, advances in imaging technology have led to the development of several promising modalities. These modalities include color and power Doppler ultrasonography, ultrasound contrast agents, intermittent and harmonic ultrasound imaging, MR contrast imaging, MRI with fat suppression, MRI spectroscopy, three-dimensional MRI spectroscopy, elastography, and radioimmunoscintigraphy. These newer imaging techniques appear to improve the yield of prostate cancer detection and staging, but are limited in availability and thus require further validation. This article reviews the status of current imaging modalities for prostate cancer and identifies emerging imaging technologies that may improve the diagnosis and staging of this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11301831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  6 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance elastography: a general overview of its current and future applications in brain imaging.

Authors:  Antonio Di Ieva; Fabio Grizzi; Elisa Rognone; Zion Tsz Ho Tse; Tassanai Parittotokkaporn; Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena; Manfred Tschabitscher; Christian Matula; Siegfrid Trattnig; Riccardo Rodriguez Y Baena
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Quantitative ultrasound in cancer imaging.

Authors:  Ernest J Feleppa; Jonathan Mamou; Christopher R Porter; Junji Machi
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  Imaging prostate cancer: an update on positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kirsten Bouchelouche; Baris Turkbey; Peter Choyke; Jacek Capala
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Recent developments in tissue-type imaging (TTI) for planning and monitoring treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ernest J Feleppa; Christopher R Porter; Jeffrey Ketterling; Paul Lee; Shreedevi Dasgupta; Stella Urban; Andrew Kalisz
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  A standardised study to compare prostate cancer targeting efficacy of five radiolabelled bombesin analogues.

Authors:  Rogier P J Schroeder; Cristina Müller; Suzanne Reneman; Marleen L Melis; Wout A P Breeman; Erik de Blois; Chris H Bangma; Eric P Krenning; Wytske M van Weerden; Marion de Jong
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Imaging heterogeneity of peptide delivery and binding in solid tumors using SPECT imaging and MRI.

Authors:  J C Haeck; K Bol; C M A de Ridder; L Brunel; J A Fehrentz; J Martinez; W M van Weerden; M R Bernsen; M de Jong; J F Veenland
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.138

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.