Literature DB >> 15749561

Pressure-dependent attenuation with microbubbles at low mechanical index.

Meng-Xing Tang1, Robert J Eckersley, J Alison Noble.   

Abstract

It has previously been shown that the attenuation of ultrasound (US) by microbubble contrast agents is dependent on acoustic pressure (Chen et al. 2002). Although previous studies have modelled the pressure-dependence of attenuation in single bubbles, this paper investigates this subject by considering a bulk volume of bubbles together with other linear attenuators. Specifically, a new pressure-dependent attenuation model for an inhomogeneous volume of attenuators is proposed. In this model, the effect of the attenuation on US propagation is considered. The model was validated using experimental measurements on the US contrast agent Sonovue. The results indicate, at low acoustic pressures, a linear relationship between the attenuation of Sonovue, measured in dB, and the insonating acoustic pressure.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15749561     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  9 in total

1.  DNA-coated microbubbles with biochemically tunable ultrasound contrast activity.

Authors:  Matthew A Nakatsuka; Mark J Hsu; Sadik C Esener; Jennifer N Cha; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Mapping microbubble viscosity using fluorescence lifetime imaging of molecular rotors.

Authors:  Neveen A Hosny; Graciela Mohamedi; Paul Rademeyer; Joshua Owen; Yilei Wu; Meng-Xing Tang; Robert J Eckersley; Eleanor Stride; Marina K Kuimova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Shell properties and concentration stability of acoustofluidic delivery agents.

Authors:  Hussain Alsadiq; Karnaker Tupally; Robert Vogel; Ganesh Kokil; Harendra S Parekh; Martin Veidt
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-01-04

4.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability.

Authors:  M-X Tang; H Mulvana; T Gauthier; A K P Lim; D O Cosgrove; R J Eckersley; E Stride
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Experimental acoustic characterization of an endoskeletal antibubble contrast agent: First results.

Authors:  Anastasiia Panfilova; Peiran Chen; Ruud J G van Sloun; Hessel Wijkstra; Michiel Postema; Albert T Poortinga; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 6.  Stimulus-responsive ultrasound contrast agents for clinical imaging: motivations, demonstrations, and future directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Goodwin; Matthew A Nakatsuka; Robert F Mattrey
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2014-09-06

7.  Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Nico de Jong; Marcia Emmer; Annemieke van Wamel; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Characterizing Focused-Ultrasound Mediated Drug Delivery to the Heterogeneous Primate Brain In Vivo with Acoustic Monitoring.

Authors:  Shih-Ying Wu; Carlos Sierra Sanchez; Gesthimani Samiotaki; Amanda Buch; Vincent P Ferrera; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with a second-generation US contrast medium in a rat breast tumor model.

Authors:  Eun Young Ko; Sang Hoon Lee; Hak Hee Kim; Sung Moon Kim; Myung Jin Shin; Namkug Kim; Gyungyub Gong
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.