Literature DB >> 19468770

Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents.

Nico de Jong1, Marcia Emmer, Annemieke van Wamel, Michel Versluis.   

Abstract

The main constituent of an ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) is gas-filled microbubbles. An average UCA contains billions per ml. These microbubbles are excellent ultrasound scatterers due to their high compressibility. In an ultrasound field they act as resonant systems, resulting in harmonic energy in the backscattered ultrasound signal, such as energy at the subharmonic, ultraharmonic and higher harmonic frequencies. This harmonic energy is exploited for contrast enhanced imaging to discriminate the contrast agent from surrounding tissue. The amount of harmonic energy that the contrast agent bubbles generate depends on the bubble characteristics in combination with the ultrasound field applied. This paper summarizes different strategies to characterize the UCAs. These strategies can be divided into acoustic and optical methods, which focus on the linear or nonlinear responses of the contrast agent bubbles. In addition, the characteristics of individual bubbles can be determined or the bubbles can be examined when they are part of a population. Recently, especially optical methods have proven their value to study individual bubbles. This paper concludes by showing some examples of optically observed typical behavior of contrast bubbles in ultrasound fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19468770      PMCID: PMC2727586          DOI: 10.1007/s11517-009-0497-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  26 in total

Review 1.  Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy.

Authors:  P A Dijkmans; L J M Juffermans; R J P Musters; A van Wamel; F J ten Cate; W van Gilst; C A Visser; N de Jong; O Kamp
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2004-08

2.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The onset of microbubble vibration.

Authors:  Marcia Emmer; Annemieke van Wamel; Dave E Goertz; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Acoustic characterization of single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Jeroen Sijl; Emmanuel Gaud; Peter J A Frinking; Marcel Arditi; Nico de Jong; Detlef Lohse; Michel Versluis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Pressure-dependent attenuation and scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles at low acoustic pressures.

Authors:  Marcia Emmer; Hendrik J Vos; David E Goertz; Annemieke van Wamel; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Nonspherical oscillations of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Benjamin Dollet; Sander M van der Meer; Valeria Garbin; Nico de Jong; Detlef Lohse; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Clinical relevance of pressure-dependent scattering at low acoustic pressures.

Authors:  Marcia Emmer; Hendrik J Vos; Annemieke van Wamel; Dave E Goertz; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion.

Authors:  K Wei; A R Jayaweera; S Firoozan; A Linka; D M Skyba; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Therapeutic applications of lipid-coated microbubbles.

Authors:  Evan C Unger; Thomas Porter; William Culp; Rachel Labell; Terry Matsunaga; Reena Zutshi
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 15.470

View more
  36 in total

1.  Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kopechek; Kevin J Haworth; Jason L Raymond; T Douglas Mast; Stephen R Perrin; Melvin E Klegerman; Shaoling Huang; Tyrone M Porter; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Mapping microbubble viscosity using fluorescence lifetime imaging of molecular rotors.

Authors:  Neveen A Hosny; Graciela Mohamedi; Paul Rademeyer; Joshua Owen; Yilei Wu; Meng-Xing Tang; Robert J Eckersley; Eleanor Stride; Marina K Kuimova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Special issue on microbubbles: from contrast enhancement to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Eleanor Stride; Mohan Edirisinghe
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Three-Dimensional Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation for Assessing Arterial Plaques in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; Ji-Bin Liu; John R Eisenbrey; Maria Stanczak; Priscilla Machado; Jingzhi Li; Zhaojun Li; Ying Wei; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction in combination with cationic lipid microbubbles enhances gene delivery.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Yingying Liu; Guangya Xiang; Qing Lv; Gui Huang; Yali Yang; Yanrong Zhang; Yue Song; Huan Zhou; Mingxing Xie
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2011-02-19

6.  Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results.

Authors:  Daniel A King; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Assessment of the Superharmonic Response of Microbubble Contrast Agents for Acoustic Angiography as a Function of Microbubble Parameters.

Authors:  Isabel G Newsome; Thomas M Kierski; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Dynamics of micro-bubble sonication inside a phantom vessel.

Authors:  Adnan Qamar; Ravi Samtaney; Joseph L Bull
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  The delayed onset of subharmonic and ultraharmonic emissions from a phospholipid-shelled microbubble contrast agent.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Ivy Awuor; Keri Thomas; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Leveraging the Imaging Transmit Pulse to Manipulate Phase-Change Nanodroplets for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

Authors:  Yiying I Zhu; Heechul Yoon; Andrew X Zhao; Stanislav Y Emelianov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.