Literature DB >> 25195785

Stimulus-responsive ultrasound contrast agents for clinical imaging: motivations, demonstrations, and future directions.

Andrew P Goodwin1, Matthew A Nakatsuka, Robert F Mattrey.   

Abstract

Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents allow imaging of the vasculature with excellent resolution and signal-to-noise ratios. Contrast in microbubbles derives from their interaction with an ultrasound wave to generate signal at harmonic frequencies of the stimulating pulse; subtracting the elastic echo caused by the surrounding tissue can enhance the specificity of these harmonic signals significantly. The nonlinear acoustic emission is caused by pressure-driven microbubble size fluctuations, which in both theoretical descriptions and empirical measurements was found to depend on the mechanical properties of the shell that encapsulates the microbubble as well as stabilizes it against the surrounding aqueous environment. Thus biochemically induced switching between a rigid 'off' state and a flexible 'on' state provides a mechanism for sensing chemical markers for disease. In our research, we coupled DNA oligonucleotides to a stabilizing lipid monolayer to modulate stiffness of the shell and thereby induce stimulus-responsive behavior. In initial proof-of-principle studies, it was found that signal modulation came primarily from DNA crosslinks preventing the microbubble size oscillations rather than merely damping the signal. Next, these microbubbles were redesigned to include an aptamer sequence in the crosslinking strand, which not only allowed the sensing of the clotting enzyme thrombin but also provided a general strategy for sensing other soluble biomarkers in the bloodstream. Finally, the thrombin-sensitive microbubbles were validated in a rabbit model, presenting the first example of an ultrasound contrast agent that could differentiate between active and inactive clots for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25195785      PMCID: PMC4268373          DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol        ISSN: 1939-0041


  75 in total

1.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion.

Authors:  K Wei; A R Jayaweera; S Firoozan; A Linka; D M Skyba; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Imaging of aortic abnormalities with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. A pictorial comparison with CT.

Authors:  D-A Clevert; M Stickel; T Johnson; C Glaser; D-A Clevert; H O Steitz; R Kopp; K W Jauch; M Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Imparting the unique properties of DNA into complex material architectures and functions.

Authors:  Phyllis F Xu; Hyunwoo Noh; Ju Hun Lee; Dylan W Domaille; Matthew A Nakatsuka; Andrew P Goodwin; Jennifer N Cha
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 31.041

Review 5.  Lessons from phase III clinical trials on anti-VEGF therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain; Dan G Duda; Jeffrey W Clark; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2006-01

6.  Optimization of ultrasound contrast agents with computational models to improve selection of ligands and binding strength.

Authors:  Timothy M Maul; Drew D Dudgeon; Michael T Beste; Daniel A Hammer; John S Lazo; Flordeliza S Villanueva; William R Wagner
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Activatable cell penetrating peptides linked to nanoparticles as dual probes for in vivo fluorescence and MR imaging of proteases.

Authors:  Emilia S Olson; Tao Jiang; Todd A Aguilera; Quyen T Nguyen; Lesley G Ellies; Miriam Scadeng; Roger Y Tsien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Imaging of angiogenesis using Cadence contrast pulse sequencing and targeted contrast agents.

Authors:  Susanne M Stieger; Paul A Dayton; Mark A Borden; Charles F Caskey; Stephen M Griffey; Erik R Wisner; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Nanoparticles that communicate in vivo to amplify tumour targeting.

Authors:  Geoffrey von Maltzahn; Ji-Ho Park; Kevin Y Lin; Neetu Singh; Christian Schwöppe; Rolf Mesters; Wolfgang E Berdel; Erkki Ruoslahti; Michael J Sailor; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 43.841

10.  The presence of VEGF receptors on the luminal surface of endothelial cells affects VEGF distribution and VEGF signaling.

Authors:  Marianne O Stefanini; Florence T H Wu; Feilim Mac Gabhann; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Applications of aptamers in targeted imaging: state of the art.

Authors:  Casey A Dougherty; Weibo Cai; Hao Hong
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Selective Vaporization of Superheated Nanodroplets for Rapid, Sensitive, Acoustic Biosensing.

Authors:  Rajarshi Chattaraj; Praveena Mohan; Jeremy D Besmer; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Multifunctional Theranostic Nanoparticles for Enhanced Tumor Targeted Imaging and Synergistic FUS/Chemotherapy on Murine 4T1 Breast Cancer Cell.

Authors:  Zhengyue Kang; Min Yang; Xiaoling Feng; Hongjian Liao; Zhifei Zhang; Yonghong Du
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  Endoglin-targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in hepatoblastoma xenografts.

Authors:  Rong Shan; Bei Wang; Aiguang Wang; Zongguo Sun; Fengyun Dong; Ju Liu; Hongjun Sun
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.967

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.