Literature DB >> 15747345

Finite element analysis of the mouse tibia: estimating endocortical strain during three-point bending in SAMP6 osteoporotic mice.

Matthew J Silva1, Michael D Brodt, William J Hucker.   

Abstract

To support future studies of tibial bending in a murine model of senile osteoporosis (SAMP6), we sought to determine the relationship between applied external bending force and peak endocortical strain in the tibiae of SAMP6 and control SAMR1 mice. The lower hindlimbs of mice were loaded by three-point bending in the lateral-medial plane with a support length of 10 mm. Force-periosteal strain relations were first determined using standard strain gauge methods. Finite-element analysis (FEA) models of the tibia-fibula were generated based on microcomputed tomography images. After choosing appropriate boundary conditions, FEA predictions of periosteal strains were within 15% of measured values. FEA revealed a narrow (3-4 mm) region of the central tibia with well-developed bending strains (tension medially, compression laterally); outside this region, we observed high shear strains. Both the strain gauge data and the finite-element simulations indicated that the tibia of the SAMP6 mouse was 20-25% stiffer than the SAMR1 tibia, consistent with a larger moment of inertia and higher cortical bone modulus. Thus, higher levels of force are required to produce the same target values of strain in the SAMP6 tibia. The ratio of periosteal to endocortical strain in the region of interest was similar for the two mouse strains (1.5-1.6). Based on these ratios, we scaled the strain gauge data to estimate the force-endocortical strain relations for the two mouse strains. In conclusion, FEA, with supporting strain gauge measurements, has provided unique insight regarding the strain environment throughout the tibia during three-point bending in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15747345     DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.20171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol        ISSN: 1552-4884


  15 in total

1.  Load/strain distribution between ulna and radius in the mouse forearm compression loading model.

Authors:  Yunkai Lu; Ganesh Thiagarajan; Daniel P Nicolella; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  N-cadherin and cadherin 11 modulate postnatal bone growth and osteoblast differentiation by distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Adriana Di Benedetto; Marcus Watkins; Susan Grimston; Valerie Salazar; Christine Donsante; Gabriel Mbalaviele; Glenn L Radice; Roberto Civitelli
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Attenuated response to in vivo mechanical loading in mice with conditional osteoblast ablation of the connexin43 gene (Gja1).

Authors:  Susan K Grimston; Michael D Brodt; Matthew J Silva; Roberto Civitelli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Mechanical stimulation of bone formation is normal in the SAMP6 mouse.

Authors:  Matthew J Silva; Michael D Brodt
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Constrained tibial vibration in mice: a method for studying the effects of vibrational loading of bone.

Authors:  Blaine A Christiansen; Philip V Bayly; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  An in-situ fluorescence-based optical extensometry system for imaging mechanically loaded bone.

Authors:  Christopher Price; Wen Li; John E Novotny; Liyun Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  Multiscale finite element modeling of mechanical strains and fluid flow in osteocyte lacunocanalicular system.

Authors:  Thiagarajan Ganesh; Loretta E Laughrey; Mohammadmehdi Niroobakhsh; Nuria Lara-Castillo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Experimental and finite element analysis of dynamic loading of the mouse forearm.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagarajan; Yunkai Lu; Mark Dallas; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Resonance in the mouse tibia as a predictor of frequencies and locations of loading-induced bone formation.

Authors:  Liming Zhao; Todd Dodge; Arun Nemani; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-04-11

10.  Enhanced periosteal and endocortical responses to axial tibial compression loading in conditional connexin43 deficient mice.

Authors:  Susan K Grimston; Marcus P Watkins; Michael D Brodt; Matthew J Silva; Roberto Civitelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.